IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/sarjnl/v13y2024i1p61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Production Systems and Management Practices of Chicken Populations in Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvia Jana Harrison
  • Mayoba Barbara Moono
  • Idowu Kolawole Odubote

Abstract

The study was carried out to describe the population, population dynamics, production systems and management practices of chicken types reared in Zambia, using the 2017/2018 livestock and aquaculture census data provided by the Zambia Statistics Agency and the Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock. Data on the chicken types - Indigenous, Broiler and Layer, was analyzed for both quantitative and qualitative parameters. The population estimates for the chickens were 15,313,780, 6,078,694 and 742,981 for indigenous, broiler and layer, respectively. Flock dynamics could not be ascertained conclusively due to inadequate information. Chicken ownership was significantly skewed towards the male gender for broilers (67%) and layers (79%) while almost equal for the indigenous chickens. Indigenous chickens were more prominent in provinces with high agricultural production (Southern, Central, and Eastern at 51%). Broilers and Layers were more prominent in provinces with commercial centres (Copperbelt and Lusaka at 68% and 75% respectively). The main purpose of rearing indigenous chickens was mainly sales for income (66.1%) and home consumption (32.3%). The main production systems were found to be traditional for indigenous chickens (87%) and intensive for broiler and layer chickens (70.3% and 44%, respectively). The main feeding practices were free-range feeding (80.6%) and free-range with supplementation (17.4%) for indigenous chickens). Diseases notably, Newcastle was found to be debilitating and a great hindrance to livestock production and productivity. The data collection instrument will require fine-tuning to obtain more technical details on production and productivity and better estimate the population dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvia Jana Harrison & Mayoba Barbara Moono & Idowu Kolawole Odubote, 2024. "Production Systems and Management Practices of Chicken Populations in Zambia," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 1-61, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:sarjnl:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/sar/article/download/0/0/49684/53690
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/sar/article/view/0/49684
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ugo Pica-Ciamarra & Derek Baker & Nancy Morgan & Alberto Zezza & Carlo Azzarri & Cheikh Ly & Longin Nsiima & Simplice Nouala & Patrick Okello & Joseph Sserugga, 2014. "Investing in the Livestock Sector : Why Good Numbers Matter, A Sourcebook for Decision Makers on How to Improve Livestock Data," World Bank Publications - Reports 17830, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baker, Derek & Enahoro, Dolapo, 2014. "Policy analysis and advocacy for livestock-based development: The gap between household-level analysis and higher-level models," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P2), pages 361-364.
    2. Msangi, Siwa & Enahoro, Dolapo & Herrero, Mario & Magnan, Nicholas & Havlik, Petr & Notenbaert, An & Nelgen, Signe, 2014. "Integrating livestock feeds and production systems into agricultural multi-market models: The example of IMPACT," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P2), pages 365-377.
    3. Carletto,Calogero & Dillon,Andrew S. & Zezza,Alberto, 2021. "Agricultural Data Collection to Minimize Measurement Error and Maximize Coverage," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9745, The World Bank.
    4. Yaméogo, Nadège Désirée & Nabassaga, Tiguéné & Ncube, Mthuli, 2014. "Diversification and sophistication of livestock products: The case of African countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P2), pages 398-407.
    5. Nyanjige Mbembela Mayala & Mangasini Atanasi Katundu & Elibariki Emmanuel Msuya, 2019. "Socio-cultural Factors influencing livestock investment decisions among Smallholder Farmers in Mbulu and Bariadi Districts, Tanzania," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(5), pages 1214-1230, October.
    6. Nadège Désirée Yaméogo & Mthuli Ncube & Tiguéné Nabassaga, 2014. "Working Paper - 212 - Diversification and Sophistication of Livestock Products: the Case of African Countries," Working Paper Series 2148, African Development Bank.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:sarjnl:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.