IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v9y2015i2p199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing Cost of Quality in Laboratory of Water Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mouna Zahar
  • Abdellah El barkany
  • Ahmed El biyaali

Abstract

Drinking water quality is of fundamental importance to human physiology and the durability of humanity. In today’s environment, many laboratories of water analysis are challenged to maintain or increase their quality while simultaneously lowering their overall costs. The aim of this research is to classify and determine different quality costs in Moroccan laboratory of water analysis by implemented the Prevention-Appraisal-Failure (PAF) approach. Using data collected during six month, we found that approximately 77.9 % of total quality costs was spent on costs of “good quality†(prevention and appraisal), while 22.1 % was spent on costs of “poor quality†(internal and external failures). This is an ideal situation, prevention costs will be the largest portion of the total Cost of Quality (COQ). By minimizing delay and Claims (retest) can reduced external failure cost laboratory given weighted to customer needs because of the good quality of service. The cost of processing and correcting such errors was minimum. The fundamental point is to monitor the effects of the quality measures taken to reduce the number of failures. The article also explains the benefits of the eventual adoption of a COQ approach in laboratory, proper frame work and we propose guideline for significant and non-significant factors which should consider in laboratory of water analysis.Â

Suggested Citation

  • Mouna Zahar & Abdellah El barkany & Ahmed El biyaali, 2015. "Managing Cost of Quality in Laboratory of Water Analysis," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(2), pages 199-199, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:9:y:2015:i:2:p:199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/41841/24043
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/41841
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:9:y:2015:i:2:p:199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.