IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v9y2015i11p135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecasting systematic risk by Least Angel Regression, AdaBoost and Kernel Ridge Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Mahdi Salehi
  • Mahdi Moradi
  • Samaneh Molaei

Abstract

In according to importance of risk in financial decision and investment is one of issue that helps to investors is existing tools and appropriate models in order to predict systematic risk. Aim of this research was forecasting systematic risk of companies admitted at Tehran stock Exchange by Least Angel Regression (LARS), AdaBoost and Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR) and comparing ability of the algorithms in order to find the best methods of the test. In this study the financial data of (1159 observations) during 2005-2014. We used MATLAB software vision (R2013b). Results indicated that Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR) with 9.65% error (90.35% confidence) in comparison with Least Angel Regression (LARS) with 12.15% error (87.85% confidence) and AdaBoost with 28.91% error (71.09 confidence) has more ability for forecasting systematic risk. Moreover, ability of forecasting systematic risk in Least Angel Regression (LARS) is more than AdaBoost.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahdi Salehi & Mahdi Moradi & Samaneh Molaei, 2015. "Forecasting systematic risk by Least Angel Regression, AdaBoost and Kernel Ridge Regression," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(11), pages 135-135, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:9:y:2015:i:11:p:135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/53766/28776
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/53766
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mandelker, Gershon N. & Rhee, S. Ghon, 1984. "The Impact of the Degrees of Operating and Financial Leverage on Systematic Risk of Common Stock," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 45-57, March.
    2. Luc Laeven & Lev Ratnovski & Hui Tong, 2014. "Bank Size and Systemic Risk," IMF Staff Discussion Notes 14/4, International Monetary Fund.
    3. Gwangheon Hong & Sudipto Sarkar, 2007. "Equity Systematic Risk (Beta) and Its Determinants," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 423-466, June.
    4. Mr. Luc Laeven & Mr. Lev Ratnovski & Mr. Hui Tong, 2014. "Bank Size and Systemic Risk," IMF Staff Discussion Notes 2014/004, International Monetary Fund.
    5. Veliyath, Rajaram & Ferris, Stephen P., 1997. "Agency influences on risk reduction and operating performance: An empirical investigation among strategic groups," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 219-230, July.
    6. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, September.
    7. Mark Kroll & Peter Wright & Richard A. Heiens, 1999. "The contribution of product quality to competitive advantage: impacts on systematic variance and unexplained variance in returns," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 375-384, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chowdhury, Biplob & Jeyasreedharan, Nagaratnam, 2019. "An empirical examination of the jump and diffusion aspects of asset pricing: Japanese evidence," Working Papers 2019-02, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics.
    2. Liu, Hao & Zhang, Hao & Gao, Ya-Chun & Chen, Xu-Dong, 2022. "Firm age and beta: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 244-261.
    3. Sarmiento-Sabogal, Julio & Sadeghi, Mehdi, 2014. "Unlevered betas and the cost of equity capital: An empirical approach," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 90-105.
    4. T.G. Saji, 2018. "Predicting Market Betas," Paradigm, , vol. 22(2), pages 160-174, December.
    5. Samet Günay, 2017. "Risk Configuration of S&P 500 Industries: Sigma-risk and Alpha-risk Approximation," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 11(2), pages 196-221, May.
    6. Delis, Manthos D. & Hasan, Iftekhar & Tsionas, Efthymios G., 2015. "Firms' risk endogenous to strategic management choices," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 16/2015, Bank of Finland.
    7. Adrian Lei & Martin Yick & Keith Lam, 2013. "Does tax convexity matter for risk? A dynamic study of tax asymmetry and equity beta," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 131-147, July.
    8. Marc Blatter & Andreas Fuster, 2022. "Scale effects on efficiency and profitability in the Swiss banking sector," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 158(1), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Q. Farooq Akram & Casper Christophersen, 2017. "Pricing in the Norwegian Interbank Market – the Effects of Liquidity and Implicit Government Support," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 79(2), pages 165-204, April.
    10. Christian Castro & Jorge E. Galán, 2019. "Drivers of Productivity in the Spanish Banking Sector: Recent Evidence," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 55(2), pages 115-141, June.
    11. TEKIN, Bilgehan, 2021. "Financial Ratios Affecting Systematic Risk In Joint-Stock Companies: Bist Technology (Xutek) Industry Companies Case In Turkey," Studii Financiare (Financial Studies), Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 25(1), pages 95-113, March.
    12. Jiahong Gao & Robert R. Reed, 2023. "Preventing bank panics: The role of the regulator's preferences," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 387-422, May.
    13. Steven Toms, 2014. "Accounting-based Risk Management and the Capital Asset Pricing Model: An Empirical Comparison," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 24(2), pages 127-133, June.
    14. Ma, Chang & Nguyen, Xuan-Hai, 2021. "Too big to fail and optimal regulation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 747-758.
    15. Buch, Claudia M. & Krause, Thomas & Tonzer, Lena, 2019. "Drivers of systemic risk: Do national and European perspectives differ?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 160-176.
    16. repec:bof:bofrdp:urn:nbn:fi:bof-201503041096 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Addo, Kwabena Aboah & Hussain, Nazim & Iqbal, Jamshed, 2021. "Corporate Governance and Banking Systemic Risk: A Test of the Bundling Hypothesis," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    18. Dewandaru, Ginanjar & Bacha, Obiyathulla Ismath & Masih, A. Mansur M. & Masih, Rumi, 2015. "Risk-return characteristics of Islamic equity indices: Multi-timescales analysis," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 115-138.
    19. Stijn Claessens & Neeltje van Horen, 2015. "The Impact of the Global Financial Crisis on Banking Globalization," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 63(4), pages 868-918, November.
    20. Patricia Palhau Mora, 2018. "The “Too Big to Fail” Subsidy in Canada: Some Estimates," Staff Working Papers 18-9, Bank of Canada.
    21. Pino, Gabriel, 2022. "Did small or large US banks transmit more risk during the Subprime crisis?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:9:y:2015:i:11:p:135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.