IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v10y2015i1p76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ergonomic Knob Design Validation for Improved Musculoskeletal Comfort

Author

Listed:
  • Poh Kiat Ng
  • Yue Hang Tan
  • Kian Siong Jee
  • Li Wah Thong
  • Jian Ai Yeow
  • Chiew Yean Ng

Abstract

Ergonomic control devices can minimise risks of hand-related injuries. The pinch force exerted on a control knob during operations can be minimised so that excessive physical stress and strain on the hands are reduced. This improves working performance. Studies indicate that milling machine control knobs are difficult to operate. Hence, this study aims to validate an ergonomic knob design against a milling machine knob design to determine the extent of musculoskeletal comfort improvement. An ergonomic knob is designed based on a knurled spherical knob with ergonomics features. A validation is performed by requesting 12 participants to turn the knobs in clockwise and counterclockwise directions. Pinch force data is recorded. Findings show that the ergonomic knob reduces more than 55 % of pinch force compared to the milling machine knob replica. This study is useful for machine designers in the development of safer and more ergonomic knobs for various equipment, apparatus and devices.

Suggested Citation

  • Poh Kiat Ng & Yue Hang Tan & Kian Siong Jee & Li Wah Thong & Jian Ai Yeow & Chiew Yean Ng, 2015. "Ergonomic Knob Design Validation for Improved Musculoskeletal Comfort," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 1-76, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:10:y:2015:i:1:p:76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/52223/29943
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/52223
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:10:y:2015:i:1:p:76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.