IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v10y2015i1p52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in Motivation between Male and Female in Slovakia in 2015

Author

Listed:
  • MiloÅ¡ Hitka
  • Milota Vetráková
  • Žaneta Balážová

Abstract

Meeting human needs or life’s challenges, internal and external environments as well as some further factors affect motivation significantly. All factors are interconnected to each other and they create mutually connected parts of network. In the paper we mention the issue of motivational differences between male and female in Slovakia in the year 2015. Sampling unit contains 4,099 respondents. Deep knowledge of the differences plays a key role in employee job performance and affects the employees’ motivation effectively. Results of the social inquiry confirm great similarity between motivation factors of male and female in Slovakia in 2015. Despite small significant differences we can state that there is a possibility of creating unified motivation programme for employees regardless of gender. Specific gender differences in the level of motivation have to be taken into account in order to increase motivation. In the future meeting the needs of employees can cause the changes in their motivation requirements. Therefore we suggest the organisation to update motivation programme from time to time.

Suggested Citation

  • MiloÅ¡ Hitka & Milota Vetráková & Žaneta Balážová, 2015. "Differences in Motivation between Male and Female in Slovakia in 2015," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 1-52, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:10:y:2015:i:1:p:52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/51727/29941
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/51727
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zdenko Stacho & Hana Urbancová & Katarína Stachová, 2013. "Organisational arrangement of human resources management in organisations operating in Slovakia and Czech Republic," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(7), pages 2787-2799.
    2. Anwar Ali Shah G. Syed & Nadeem Bhatti & Sabir Michael & Faiz M. Shaikh & Hina Shah, 2012. "Job Satisfaction of Faculty Members of Universities in Pakistan: A Case Study of University of Sindh-Jamshoro," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(7), pages 1-89, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blštáková Jana & Karoliny Mártonné & Csapó Ildikó & Szobi Ádám & Poór József, 2018. "Practices of Human Resource Management in Light of Cranet Empirical Research 2015–2016," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 101-142, March.
    2. Hana URBANCOVÁ & Helena ČERMÁKOVÁ, 2015. "The costs of Age Management in agricultural companies," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(1), pages 14-22.
    3. Jiří Bejtkovský, 2018. "Employee Voice: an Employee Satisfaction Level by Selected Healthcare Service Providers in the Czech Republic," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 66(6), pages 1407-1416.
    4. Dagmar Weberova & Milos Hitka & Lenka Lizbetinova, 2017. "Age and Gender Motivating Differences of Slovak Workers," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 505-513.
    5. Hana Urbancová & Katarína Stachová & Zdenko Stacho, 2015. "Methods of Recruitment in the Czech and Slovak Organizations," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 63(3), pages 1051-1060.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:10:y:2015:i:1:p:52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.