IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jsd123/v8y2015i9p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bamboo Reinforced Concrete Slabs for Fence Walls

Author

Listed:
  • Suppiah Subramaniam
  • Venugopal M.

Abstract

The construction industry consumes large quantities of steel and emits carbon which is a dampener for sustainable growth all over the world. As an alternative to steel, bamboo and rattan cane have been tried as reinforcement in different countries on a very small scale only. This work aims at exploring the methods of adopting bamboo reinforced concrete slabs for erecting fence walls in rural parts of south-India. Presently, fence walls are erected using steel reinforced concrete (SRC) slabs which are cast as a cottage industry, without adhering to any specification. Twenty five (25) bamboo reinforced concrete (BRC) slabs of size 1000 mm by 300 mm by 50 mm (length- width- thickness) were cast in the laboratory using M20 mix ratio. The slabs were tested using (a) ultrasonic instrument and (b) universal testing machine to assess the quality of concrete and deflection values respectively. As a comparative study these tests were repeated on SRC slabs, procured from a vendor. The results reveal that the quality of concrete in BRC slabs was better than that of the SRC slabs. The BRC slabs failed at approximately 50% of the magnitude of load taken by SRC slabs at failure. The deflection and the crack width also followed the same trend. The cost analysis performed indicates that BRC slabs are cheaper by 25 to 30%. Therefore, it is recommended to adopt BRC slabs for erecting fence walls by which more bamboo will be grown, leading to a sustainable growth of the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Suppiah Subramaniam & Venugopal M., 2015. "Bamboo Reinforced Concrete Slabs for Fence Walls," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(9), pages 1-1, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:8:y:2015:i:9:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/download/51884/28381
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/51884
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:8:y:2015:i:9:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.