IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jsd123/v15y2023i4p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smart and Sustainable Port Performance in Thailand: A Conceptual Model

Author

Listed:
  • Weeraphong Sankla
  • Thanyaphat Muangpan

Abstract

Global seaports are interested in the concept of smart and sustainable ports that many have an impact on global trade and economics. This research aims to find the main factors and indicators of smart and sustainable port management, and confirm the factors of smart and sustainable port management using a case study of the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC) in Thailand. Mix method approach, qualitative research is used in the data collection with a total of three databases in 2015-2021. Content analysis with triangulation data is utilized to analyze these data finding the factors and indicators of smart and sustainable port management. Quantitative research is used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for confirming the factors and indicators and developing a conceptual model of smart and sustainable port performance. As the result, a conceptual model with three main factors is shown including the smart port environment, the smart port society, and the smart port economy. These main factors and indicators are represented as three factors and seventeen indicators of confirming explanation. This conceptual model for the introduction of port development explains smart and sustainable port performance and the key indicators to achieve port practice for improving international standards of smart and sustainable ports.

Suggested Citation

  • Weeraphong Sankla & Thanyaphat Muangpan, 2023. "Smart and Sustainable Port Performance in Thailand: A Conceptual Model," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(4), pages 1-1, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/download/0/0/47162/50491
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/0/47162
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asgari, Nasrin & Hassani, Ashkan & Jones, Dylan & Nguye, Huy Hoang, 2015. "Sustainability ranking of the UK major ports: Methodology and case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 19-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan Li & Xiaohan Zhang & Kaiyue Lin & Qingbo Huang, 2019. "The Analysis of a Simulation of a Port–City Green Cooperative Development, Based on System Dynamics: A Case Study of Shanghai Port, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Oh Kyoung Kwon & Xiao Ruan, 2019. "Sustainability Challenges in Maritime Transport and Logistics Industry and Its Way Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-9, March.
    3. Claudia Durán & Fredi Palominos & Raúl Carrasco & Eduardo Carrillo, 2021. "Influence of Strategic Interrelationships and Decision-Making in Chilean Port Networks on Their Degree of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Assunta Di Vaio & Luisa Varriale, 2018. "Management Innovation for Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: Managerial Accounting Instruments and Training for Competitive Green Ports beyond the Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-35, March.
    5. Mariia Dushenko & Clemet Thærie Bjorbæk & Kenn Steger-Jensen, 2018. "Application of a Sustainability Model for Assessing the Relocation of a Container Terminal: A Case Study of Kristiansand Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Heilig, Leonard & Lalla-Ruiz, Eduardo & Voß, Stefan, 2017. "Multi-objective inter-terminal truck routing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 178-202.
    7. Feiyan Han & Daming Wang & Bo Li, 2019. "Spillover Effects of Ports and Logistics Development on Economic Power: Evidence from the Chinese BTH Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Ali Majidi & Seyed M. J. Mirzapour Al-e-Hashem & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani, 2021. "Sustainability Ranking of the Iranian Major Ports by Using MCDM Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Aleksander Banasik & Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard & Argyris Kanellopoulos & G. D. H. Claassen & Jack G. A. J. Vorst, 2018. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 366-396, September.
    10. Haibo Kuang & Jiayu Zhu & Zhizhen Bai, 2023. "Study on the Interaction between Green Competitiveness of Coastal Ports and Hinterland Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Aijun Liu & Haiyang Liu & Sang-Bing Tsai & Hui Lu & Xiao Zhang & Jiangtao Wang, 2018. "Using a Hybrid Model on Joint Scheduling of Berths and Quay Cranes—From a Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Urszula Kwast-Kotlarek & Maria Hełdak, 2019. "Evaluation of the Construction and Investment Process of a High-Pressure Gas Pipeline with Use of the Trenchless Method and Open Excavation Method. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Izabela Kotowska & Marta Mańkowska & Michał Pluciński, 2018. "Inland Shipping to Serve the Hinterland: The Challenge for Seaport Authorities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Wan, Chengpeng & Yan, Xinping & Zhang, Di & Qu, Zhuohua & Yang, Zaili, 2019. "An advanced fuzzy Bayesian-based FMEA approach for assessing maritime supply chain risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 222-240.
    15. Akbari, Negar & Irawan, Chandra A. & Jones, Dylan F. & Menachof, David, 2017. "A multi-criteria port suitability assessment for developments in the offshore wind industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PA), pages 118-133.
    16. Sahar Azarkamand & Alsnosy Balbaa & Christopher Wooldridge & Rosa Mari Darbra, 2020. "Climate Change—Challenges and Response Options for the Port Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    17. Martínez-Moya, Julián & Vazquez-Paja, Barbara & Gimenez Maldonado, Jose Andrés, 2019. "Energy efficiency and CO2 emissions of port container terminal equipment: Evidence from the Port of Valencia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 312-319.
    18. Marasco, Addolorata & Romano, Alessandro, 2018. "Inter-port interactions in the Le Havre-Hamburg range: A scenario analysis using a nonautonomous Lotka Volterra model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 207-220.
    19. Amira Ghennaï & Said Madani & Carola Hein, 2023. "Evaluating the sustainability of scenarios for port city development with Boussole21 method," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 87-106, March.
    20. Poonam Taneja & Godert van Rhede van der Kloot & Mark van Koningsveld, 2021. "Sustainability Performance of Port Infrastructure—A Case Study of a Quay Wall," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.