IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jsd123/v13y2024i6p130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial and Non-Spatial Factors Influencing Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Urban Green Spaces (UGS): A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Aimi Norhanani Nordin
  • Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling
  • Mou Leong Tan
  • Chin Siong Ho
  • Hishamuddin Mohd Ali

Abstract

With numerous ecosystem services of urban green spaces (UGS), contributing to sustainability and a better quality of life, UGS provision is perceived as a pivotal role in urban planning. However, concern arises as to what extent local governments have effectively provided good quality and adequate quantity of UGS for the public? Provisioning those UGS aspects has been given a low priority due to insufficient resources and the limited budget allocated by local governments. As such, maintenance and management effectiveness of UGS is detrimentally affected, resulting in disused, overused spaces and thus hot spots for crimes. Therefore, public monetary contribution via taxation is suggested as an alternative to ensuring the continuity and sustainability of UGS services. This review paper is vital to identify and showcase specific factors and mediators, influencing the willingness to pay (WTP) of residents/users for UGS services. Methodologically, after conducting Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) for the purpose of article screening and selection based on the two primary databases (Google Scholar and Elsevier), this paper reviewed 18 journal articles, from the year 2013 to 2020. Along with the indirect sub-factors, namely environmental behaviour/attitude and socioeconomic profiles of users, there are three main spatial and non-spatial variables (factors) identified- (i) accessibility/proximity to the nearest UGS; (ii) quantity/adequacy of UGS; and (iii) quality of UGS within a township area, influencing satisfaction and enjoyment as well as reasons and frequency of park visiting of users (mediators), which consequently affect their WTP for UGS.

Suggested Citation

  • Aimi Norhanani Nordin & Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling & Mou Leong Tan & Chin Siong Ho & Hishamuddin Mohd Ali, 2024. "Spatial and Non-Spatial Factors Influencing Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Urban Green Spaces (UGS): A Review," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(6), pages 130-130, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/download/0/0/44106/46435
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/0/44106
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Bonaventura Forleo & Nicola Gagliardi & Luca Romagnoli, 2015. "Determinants of Willingness to Pay for an Urban Green Area: A Contingent Valuation Survey of College Students," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 4(1), pages 7-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafael Robina Ramírez & Manuel Pulido Fernández, 2018. "Religious Travellers’ Improved Attitude towards Nature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Emylia Shakira Jamean & Azlan Abas, 2023. "Valuation of Visitor Perception of Urban Forest Ecosystem Services in Kuala Lumpur," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Hutcheson, Walter & Hoagland, Porter & Jin, Di, 2018. "Valuing environmental education as a cultural ecosystem service at Hudson River Park," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 387-394.
    4. George Halkos & Aikaterini Leonti & Eleni Sardianou, 2020. "Assessing the Preservation of Parks and Natural Protected Areas: A Review of Contingent Valuation Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Arsene Mushagalusa Balasha & Benjamin Murhula Balasha & Lebon Hwali Masheka & Dominique Aganze Mulume & Sage Weremubi Mwisha & Vianney Mulema Ngabo & Alexander-Armand Amatcho & Aloise Bitagirwa Ndele , 2022. "Students’ Willingness to Plant Trees and Pay for Their Maintenance on Campuses in the Democratic Republic of Congo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.