IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jsd123/v10y2017i5p61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Peat and Sawdust Truly Improve Quality of Briquettes as Fuel Alternative?

Author

Listed:
  • Andi Bustan
  • Muhammad Arsyad

Abstract

The availability of energy and fuel is always a critical issue, and currently the increasing scarcity and price of kerosene is causing problems for both households and businesses. For example, chicken farmers in Central Kalimantan need to maintain the room temperature when nursing chicks up to 12 days old, and currently have few alternatives to kerosene stoves. Non-carbonized briquettes made from a mix of peat and sawdust can provide an alternative fuel source. The sawdust is available from local sawmills, which is otherwise an unutilized waste product that is burnt off, so adding to local smoke pollution. This study was conducted to determine the optimal composition and manufacturing process to produce bricks that have a maximal calorific content whilst maintaining a long burning time and a reduced tendency to break. Analyses in the laboratory showed that the highest calorific content obtainable was 19 020.63 kJ/kg with a peat/sawdust ratio of 2-1 (20 kg of peat and 10 kg of sawdust). These briquettes had a production efficiency of 83.26%, and calculations showed the overall production cost of the finished product to be around 40% lower than that of kerosene. The results indicate that a peat soil and sawdust mix produce a briquette that is viable as a fuel alternative, and based on this the researcher recommends that it be further developed commercially to meet the additional energy demands at lower cost of people in rural areas and industrial sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Andi Bustan & Muhammad Arsyad, 2017. "Are Peat and Sawdust Truly Improve Quality of Briquettes as Fuel Alternative?," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(5), pages 1-61, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:10:y:2017:i:5:p:61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/download/68307/38705
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/68307
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:10:y:2017:i:5:p:61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.