Author
Listed:
- Ni Kadek Sri Ebtha Yuni
- I Nyoman Norken
- Dewa Ketut Sudarsana
- Ida Bagus Putu Adnyana
Abstract
Documents received during the tender, are in the form of drawings, specifications, bill of quantity (BQ), and the general terms of the contract. Tender activity will bring a variety of risks during the project implementation, and this research is done to identify and assessment of risks, mitigating risk and determining the ownership of the dominant risk.The research was conducted on a private building construction project at Badung Regency in Bali, by using a qualitative method and data collection was done through interview, brainstorming with experts and questionnaires. Among the 39 risk identified, 15 risks were obtained from the previous research, and the remaining 24 risks in this research.The results of this risk assessment were that 18 risks (46.2%) categorized into unacceptable, that include- the addition items of work, the drawing does not match with plan, and the changes in the material specifications. Risk assessment fell into the undesirable category that 21 risks (53.8%), including the mismatch information from planners, the arithmetic error, and materials used were not available on the market. Mitigation was done to dominant risk, among others by reassessing, submitting the contract change order, and asking questions. The biggest risk of ownership was the contractor, namely 39 risks with 18 unacceptable and 21 undesirable risks, this mean, problems associated with tender documents should receive the attention to contractors, planner consultants, owners and Quantity Surveyor (QS) consultants. Contractors as the recipient of the biggest risk were expected to increase the competence of those involved in the tender process.
Suggested Citation
Ni Kadek Sri Ebtha Yuni & I Nyoman Norken & Dewa Ketut Sudarsana & Ida Bagus Putu Adnyana, 2017.
"Risk Analysis of Tender Documents on the Execution of Private Construction Work at Badung Regency, Bali Province, Indonesia,"
Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(4), pages 130-130, July.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:10:y:2017:i:4:p:130
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:10:y:2017:i:4:p:130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.