Author
Listed:
- Lloyd Mabonga
- Michael Pillay
Abstract
  Bananas (Musa spp. L.) are grouped on the basis of their genomic origins in relation to Musa acuminata (A genome) and M. balbisiana (B genome). The two ancestral wild seeded diploid species evolved in vastly different geographical areas and contributed several agronomic traits towards the present genetic composition of cultivated bananas. Most cultivated bananas are triploid (AAA, AAB and ABB), some are diploid (AA, BB and AB) and a few are tetraploids (AAAA, AAAB, AABB and ABBB). Limitations on the correct identification of the A and B genomes in Musa have generated need for the development of new and more reliable techniques. Distinguishing the A and the B genome remains practically and theoretically important for banana breeders. The aim of the research was to develop a DNA based A genome specific marker for the identification of the A genome in bananas. A putative marker (600 bp) specific to the A genome was identified by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique. A sequence characterised amplified region (SCAR) marker was developed from the RAPD amplicon. The SCAR primers annealed a 500 bp fragment specific to the A genome in a sample of 22 randomly selected homo- and heterogenomic A genome containing accessions representing different genome combinations. The 500 bp SCAR marker is useful for the identification of the A genome. However an additional 700 bp fragment annealed in all M. balbisiana genotypes and in five of the eight heterogenomic accessions, suggesting lack of differentiation between the A and B genome. This study has provided a 500 bp A genome SCAR marker and recent evidence that the A and B genomes of banana may not be as differentiated as previously considered.
Suggested Citation
Lloyd Mabonga & Michael Pillay, 2017.
"SCAR Marker for the A Genome of Bananas (Musa spp. L.) Supports Lack of Differentiation between the A and B Genomes,"
Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 1-64, May.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:64
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.