IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v8y2016i6p49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Different DNA Isolation Protocols from Ziziphus spina-christi (L.) Leaves through RAPD and ISSR Markers

Author

Listed:
  • Fatemeh Bina
  • Zabihollah Zamani
  • Vahideh Nazeri
  • Daryush Talei

Abstract

Genomic analysis of plants relies on high quantity and quality of pure DNA. Extraction and purification of DNA from woody and medicinal plants, such as fruit trees present a great challenge due to accumulation of a large amount of co-purify with DNA, including polysaccharides, polyphenols and proteins. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the extraction protocols to reduce these compounds to the lowest level. A study was conducted to compare six DNA extraction and precipitation methods for genomic analysis in Ziziphus spina-christi (L.) plant tissues. The results showed significant differences in DNA contents among the six methods. Quantity and quality of extracted genomic DNAs were compared by employing the spectrophotometer, Nano-Drop, agarose gel electrophoresis, digestion by restriction enzymes and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods and molecular marker such as RAPD and ISSR. The method of Vroh Bi et al., provided the best results (208.89 ng/μL) in terms of quantity and quality of DNA, and Doyle and Doyle method as second method for leaves sample were chosen. According to the results, the method of Bi et al. is recommended for DNA extraction from plant tissues having high level of polysaccharides and phenol compounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatemeh Bina & Zabihollah Zamani & Vahideh Nazeri & Daryush Talei, 2016. "Comparative Different DNA Isolation Protocols from Ziziphus spina-christi (L.) Leaves through RAPD and ISSR Markers," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(6), pages 1-49, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:8:y:2016:i:6:p:49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/58302/31998
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/58302
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:8:y:2016:i:6:p:49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.