IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v8y2016i10p63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Gene Transfer into Chicken Gonads by Combining Transposons with Polyethylenimine

Author

Listed:
  • Saisai Wang
  • Yali Wang
  • Dan Shen
  • Li Zhang
  • Songlei Xue
  • Hengmi Cui
  • Chengyi Song
  • Bo Gao

Abstract

Transposon mediated transfection is a promising, safe, and convenient way to generate transgenic chicken compared with virus-mediated technology and the in vitro modification of primordial germ cells (PGCs). To establish a simple method for in vivo transfection of chicken PGCs, we applied four different transposon systems (PB, SB, Tol2, and ZB) to investigate the gene transfer efficiency of chicken gonads via direct injection of a mixture of transposon and transposase plasmids and transfection reagent (polyethylenimine, PEI) into the subgerminal cavity of Hamburger and Hamilton stage 2-3 chick embryos. We also compared the effect of the amount of plasmids injected on the gene transfer efficiency of chicken gonads. We found that over 70% of the gonads were green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive across all four transposon groups, and that the proportion of GFP-positive gonads was not significantly different between different transposons. Some GFP positive cells in gonads were confirmed as germ cells by co-labeling with the germ cell specific antibody. We also found that the proportions of GFP-positive gonads decreased significantly with a decrease of plasmid dose from 100 ng to 20 or 50 ng. Here we revealed that a combination of transposons with PEI is a simple and efficient method for gene transfer into chicken gonads and able to transfect PGCs in vivo that could be used for the production of transgenic chickens.

Suggested Citation

  • Saisai Wang & Yali Wang & Dan Shen & Li Zhang & Songlei Xue & Hengmi Cui & Chengyi Song & Bo Gao, 2016. "Efficient Gene Transfer into Chicken Gonads by Combining Transposons with Polyethylenimine," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(10), pages 1-63, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:8:y:2016:i:10:p:63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/61650/33765
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/61650
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victoria M. Bedell & Ying Wang & Jarryd M. Campbell & Tanya L. Poshusta & Colby G. Starker & Randall G. Krug II & Wenfang Tan & Sumedha G. Penheiter & Alvin C. Ma & Anskar Y. H. Leung & Scott C. Fahre, 2012. "In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system," Nature, Nature, vol. 491(7422), pages 114-118, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ulaganathan, Kandasamy & Goud, Sravanthi & Reddy, Madhavi & Kayalvili, Ulaganathan, 2017. "Genome engineering for breaking barriers in lignocellulosic bioethanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1080-1107.
    2. Valentina Cigliola & Adam Shoffner & Nutishia Lee & Jianhong Ou & Trevor J. Gonzalez & Jiaul Hoque & Clayton J. Becker & Yanchao Han & Grace Shen & Timothy D. Faw & Muhammad M. Abd-El-Barr & Shyni Var, 2023. "Spinal cord repair is modulated by the neurogenic factor Hb-egf under direction of a regeneration-associated enhancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. D’Juan T. Farmer & Jennifer E. Dukov & Hung-Jhen Chen & Claire Arata & Jose Hernandez-Trejo & Pengfei Xu & Camilla S. Teng & Robert E. Maxson & J. Gage Crump, 2024. "Cellular transitions during cranial suture establishment in zebrafish," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Shanmugam, Sabarathinam & Ngo, Huu-Hao & Wu, Yi-Rui, 2020. "Advanced CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing tools for microbial biofuels production: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1107-1119.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:8:y:2016:i:10:p:63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.