IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v8y2015i1p25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthy Pork Production through Dietary n6:n3 Ratio Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Jyun-Ru Yang
  • Tu-Fa Lien

Abstract

The meat fat fatty acid composition could influent consumer health. Thus, this study was though dietary n-6-n-3 ratio regulation to production healthy pork. The experiment was used eighty LYD pigs that average weight was 66.5 kg (half male and half female) divide into five groups, they are lard group (L), soybean oil group (SO), commercial fish product group (CFP), canola oil group (CO), and 50% fish oil and 50% canola oil group (FCO) with 4 replicates, this experiment was lasted for 90 days. Experimental results indicated that the growth performances was no difference among groups; serum cholesterol, LDL and LDL-C were lower, meanwhile HDL was higher (P < 0.05) in FCO group than in control group. Back fat thickness, pork color, water holding capacity and meat fat content show no difference among groups. TBARS test on pork storage for 15 days in SO group was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than CO group. The n-6-n-3 ratio of back and belly fat in CFP, FCO and CO groups were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than in lard group. Panel evaluation score in SO group was significantly better (P < 0.05) than CO group in flavor, texture, juicy and total acceptance in longissmus muscle, but no difference in belly meat. In conclusion, the pork n-6- n-3 ratio was decreased with CFP, FCO, and CO supplementation, feeding pigs with low n-6-n-3 ratio fat could production healthy pork for consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jyun-Ru Yang & Tu-Fa Lien, 2015. "Healthy Pork Production through Dietary n6:n3 Ratio Regulation," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:8:y:2015:i:1:p:25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/53140/29735
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/53140
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:8:y:2015:i:1:p:25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.