IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v7y2015i5p175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Varying Ratios and Rates of Enriched Cattle Manure on Leaf Nitrogen Content, Yield and Quality of Tea (Camellia sinensis)

Author

Listed:
  • Isaiah Tabu
  • Vivian Kekana
  • David Kamau

Abstract

Tea (Camelia sinensis) a major cash crop in Kenya is normally grown on highly weathered and strongly acidic soils. Non-judicial use of the recommended inorganic compound fertilizer 25-5-5-5s acidifies the soil and pollutes water masses. Integrated soil fertility management, the combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizer is recommended for higher tea yield and soil health. An experiment was carried out in the Eastern Highlands of Kenya to determine the effect of different ratios and rates of enriched cattle manure on leaf nitrogen content, yield and quality of tea. Inorganic compound fertilizer 25-5-5-5s led to the highest N level in the mature leaf. Enriching organic manures with inorganic fertilizers increased the yield but reduced the quality. Tea quality parameters Theaflavins (TF) and Thearubigins decreased with increase in fertilizer rate irrespective of fertilizer type. Caffeine content however increased with increasing rate fertilizer especially in the case of inorganic compound fertilizer 25-5-5-5. Enriching organic manures with inorganic fertilizers increased the N content in the mature leaf and crop yield but reduced the quality. The study showed the beneficial effect of enriched manures in tea production.

Suggested Citation

  • Isaiah Tabu & Vivian Kekana & David Kamau, 2015. "Effect of Varying Ratios and Rates of Enriched Cattle Manure on Leaf Nitrogen Content, Yield and Quality of Tea (Camellia sinensis)," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(5), pages 175-175, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:7:y:2015:i:5:p:175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/43029/25589
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/43029
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:7:y:2015:i:5:p:175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.