IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v6y2014i2p170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of Optimal Land Use Allocation Among Small Holder (A1) Farmer Households in Zimbabwe. A Case Study of Long Croft Farm, in Mazowe District

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas Mugabe
  • Nyasha Chipunza
  • Norman Mupaso
  • Vincent Munyati
  • Fungai Makarudze

Abstract

This study aimed to develop an optimal land use plan for Long Croft farm (LCF) by assessing the available land resources. It evaluates the potential of the land resources for recommending optimum, sustainable and appropriate land utilisation in agriculture development. Possible ways in improving farming systems and more efficient utilization of the scarce available agricultural resources especially arable land were determined. The study used quantitative analytical approach in optimal land use allocation analysis. A total of thirty six structured questionnaires were used to gather data necessary for analysis. Every household at Long Croft farm was taken as a sampling unit and the area consisted of 36 A1 farmer households. The Linear programming model with an objective function that seeks to maximise net farm income subject to land, labour, capital and consumption constraints was run using Microsoft excel premium solver. The results of the study showed that A1 households are insecure with respect to their land holdings; they cannot use their land as collateral security which is affecting farmer access to credit. The households are also much constrained in land, labour, capital and consumption and as such their land allocation has been found to be not optimal. The LP (linear programming) model has depicted maize, soya beans and sugar beans for LCF when they are no factor markets. However introduction of factor markets (land and labour markets) and farmer performance groups depicted production of small grains and maize. The land reform programme promulgated by the government in 2000 should have focused on equitable right of use, optimising sustainable production, protection of natural resources/ environment against degradation and increase the effectiveness of economic growth of rural and urban population. Most of the fast track land reform developmental activities were done without proper resource surveying for optimum and sustainable resource utilization, especially land, hence great competition and losses of good agricultural uses to inefficient agricultural uses. Resource surveying, land evaluation and land use planning should be employed in Zimbabwe’s agriculture to boast production.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas Mugabe & Nyasha Chipunza & Norman Mupaso & Vincent Munyati & Fungai Makarudze, 2014. "Estimation of Optimal Land Use Allocation Among Small Holder (A1) Farmer Households in Zimbabwe. A Case Study of Long Croft Farm, in Mazowe District," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(2), pages 170-170, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:6:y:2014:i:2:p:170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/29997/19278
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/29997
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bouman, B. A. M. & Nieuwenhuyse, A., 1999. "Exploring options for sustainable beef cattle ranching in the humid tropics: a case study for the Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 145-161, February.
    2. de Wit, C. T. & van Keulen, H. & Seligman, N. G. & Spharim, I., 1988. "Application of interactive multiple goal programming techniques for analysis and planning of regional agricultural development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 211-230.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hans G. P. Jansen & Bas A. M. Bouman & Robert A. Schipper & Huib Hengsdijk & André Nieuwenhuyse, 2005. "An interdisciplinary approach to regional land use analysis using GIS, with applications to the Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(1), pages 87-104, January.
    2. Trung, N. H. & Tri, L. Q. & van Mensvoort, M. E. F. & Bregt, A. K., 2006. "Comparing land-use planning approaches in the coastal Mekong Delta of Vietnam," IWMI Books, Reports H039115, International Water Management Institute.
    3. Lu, C. H. & van Ittersum, M. K. & Rabbinge, R., 2004. "A scenario exploration of strategic land use options for the Loess Plateau in northern China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 145-170, February.
    4. Carina Barros & Gabriela Mendonça & Augusto Gameiro, 2017. "Farm-Boarding School Management: Linear Programming Contributions in the Search of Self-Sufficiency and Optimization," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 1-59, February.
    5. Cittadini, E.D. & Lubbers, M.T.M.H. & de Ridder, N. & van Keulen, H. & Claassen, G.D.H., 2008. "Exploring options for farm-level strategic and tactical decision-making in fruit production systems of South Patagonia, Argentina," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 189-198, October.
    6. Dogliotti, S. & Rossing, W. A. H. & van Ittersum, M. K., 2004. "Systematic design and evaluation of crop rotations enhancing soil conservation, soil fertility and farm income: a case study for vegetable farms in South Uruguay," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 277-302, June.
    7. Nibbering, Jan Willem & van Rheenen, Teunis, 1998. "The development of a quantitative method for setting research priorities: A critical assessment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 145-165, February.
    8. Dogliotti, S. & van Ittersum, M.K. & Rossing, W.A.H., 2005. "A method for exploring sustainable development options at farm scale: a case study for vegetable farms in South Uruguay," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 29-51, October.
    9. Kruseman, G. & Ruben, R. & Kuyvenhoven, A. & Hengsdijk, H. & van Keulen, H., 1996. "Analytical framework for disentangling the concept of sustainable land use," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 191-207.
    10. Groot, Jeroen C.J. & Rossing, Walter a.H. & Tichit, Muriel & Turpin, Nadine & Jellema, André & Baudry, Jacques & Verburg, Peter & Doyen, Luc & van de Ven, Gerrie, 2009. "On the contribution of modelling to multifunctional agriculture: learning from comparisons," MPRA Paper 65467, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. van Ittersum, M. K. & Rabbinge, R. & van Latesteijn, H. C., 1998. "Exploratory land use studies and their role in strategic policy making," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 309-330, November.
    12. Makowski, David & Hendrix, Eligius M. T. & van Ittersum, Martin K. & Rossing, Walter A. H., 2001. "Generation and presentation of nearly optimal solutions for mixed-integer linear programming, applied to a case in farming system design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 425-438, July.
    13. Senthilkumar, K. & Lubbers, M.T.M.H. & de Ridder, N. & Bindraban, P.S. & Thiyagarajan, T.M. & Giller, K.E., 2011. "Policies to support economic and environmental goals at farm and regional scales: Outcomes for rice farmers in Southern India depend on their resource endowment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 82-93, January.
    14. Zander, P. & Kachele, H., 1999. "Modelling multiple objectives of land use for sustainable development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 311-325, March.
    15. Jianbo, Lu & Zhaoqian, Wang & Penning de Vries, F. W. T., 2002. "Application of interactive multiple goal programming for red soil watershed development: a case study of Qingshishan watershed," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 313-324, September.
    16. Inés Santé Riveira & Rafael Crecente Maseda, 2006. "A Review of Rural Land-Use Planning Models," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 33(2), pages 165-183, April.
    17. Christian Flury & Nikolaus Gotsch & Peter Riede, 2000. "Socio-economic and ecological effects of alternative direct payment regimes on different Swiss Alpine regions," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 57, pages 5-26.
    18. van Keulen, Herman, 2007. "Quantitative analyses of natural resource management options at different scales," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 768-783, June.
    19. Yasmin Gomes Casagranda & Joanna Wiśniewska-Paluszak & Grzegorz Paluszak & Giana de Vargas Mores & Leila Dal Moro & Guilherme Cunha Malafaia & Denise Barros de Azevedo & Debin Zhang, 2023. "Emergent Research Themes on Sustainability in the Beef Cattle Industry in Brazil: An Integrative Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, March.
    20. Ruben, Ruerd & Moll, Henk & Kuyvenhoven, Arie, 1998. "Integrating agricultural research and policy analysis: analytical framework and policy applications for bio-economic modelling," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 331-349, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:6:y:2014:i:2:p:170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.