IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v5y2013i7p227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Costs of Nutrient Losses in Priceless Soils Eroded From the Highlands of Northwestern Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Yihenew Selassie
  • Yihenew Belay

Abstract

A study was conducted in 2011 to estimate soil and nutrient losses caused by water erosion and predict nutrient replacement costs on different land use types and slope classes at Harfetay watershed, Northwestern Ethiopia. The revised soil loss equation (RUSLE) was used to estimate the soil loss from the different land uses and slope classes in watershed. Moreover, nutrient loss from similar units was calculated by multiplying the in situ nutrient concentration of soil samples by the estimated soil loss using RUSLE. The replacement costs of nutrient losses were calculated by multiplying the nutrient loss with the price of available nutrients in urea and diammonium phosphate. The estimate of the RUSLE indicated that the average soil losses in the study watershed were 119 tons ha-1 year-1 for non-conserved crop land, 23 tons for conserved farmlands, 23 tons for forest and shrub lands, 19 tons for grazing lands, and 6 tons for plantation forest. The mean soil loss for lower slope classes (<15%), middle slope classes (15-30%) and upper slope classes (>30%) were 30.11, 48.09 and 57.22 tons ha-1 year-1, respectively. The highest losses of total nitrogen (154.7 kg ha-1 year-1), available phosphorus (1.84 kg ha-1 year-1), and organic matter (1677.9 kg ha-1 year-1) were obtained from non-conserved cropland. Conversely, the lowest values of the same parameters were registered from the land covered with plantation forest. Comparing slope classes for non conserved cropland, organic matter and nutrient losses were higher in upper slope classes followed by middle and lower ones. The replacement cost of available N and available P for non-conserved cropland, conserved cropland, forest/shrub lands, grazing lands and plantations were 121.22, 36.41, 27.09, 32.22 and 13.10 Birr ha-1 year-1, respectively (1USD = 19 Birr); and the weighted mean replacement cost in the watershed was estimated to be 98.1 Birr ha-1 year-1 which is about 20% of the cost of fertilizer applied per individual farmers in the watershed. From the study it was possible to conclude that conversion of forest lands and plantation forests to cropland causes serious soil and nutrient losses. Construction of conservation structures on cropland, however, will reduce soil and nutrient losses. To halt soil and nutrient loss and ensure sustainable land management and agricultural development in the Harfetay watershed and similar watersheds, policy and development interventions including increasing awareness of farmers on of soil and nutrient losses, enforcing land use policies and expanding bio-physical soil conservation practices are required.

Suggested Citation

  • Yihenew Selassie & Yihenew Belay, 2013. "Costs of Nutrient Losses in Priceless Soils Eroded From the Highlands of Northwestern Ethiopia," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(7), pages 227-227, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:5:y:2013:i:7:p:227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/27422/16929
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/27422
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yirga, Chillot & Hassan, Rashid M., 2010. "Social costs and incentives for optimal control of soil nutrient depletion in the central highlands of Ethiopia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(3), pages 153-160, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kibret, K. S. & Haileslassie, Amare & Mekuria Bori, Wolde & Schmitter, Petra, 2020. "Multicriteria decision-support system to assess the potential of exclosure-based conservation in Ethiopia," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 1-15.().
    2. Yigezu, Yigezu A. & Tizale, Chilot Y. & Aw-Hassan, Aden, 2015. "Modeling Farmers’ Adoption Decisions of Multiple Crop Technologies: The Case of Barley and Potatoes in Ethiopia," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211867, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Loos, T. & Sariyev, O. & Zeller, M., 2018. "The effect of gendered decision-making considering all household members on the adoption of crop rotation and livelihood outcomes in Ethiopia," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277120, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Alice Issanchou, 2016. "Soil resource, at the core of competitiveness and sustainability issues in agriculture: an economic approach," Working Papers SMART 16-01, INRAE UMR SMART.
    5. Hassan, R.M. & Crafford, J.G., 2015. "Measuring the contribution of ecological composition and functional services of ecosystems to the dynamics of KwaZulu-Natal coast fisheries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 306-313.
    6. Emerton, Lucy & Snyder, Katherine A., 2018. "Rethinking sustainable land management planning: Understanding the social and economic drivers of farmer decision-making in Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 684-694.
    7. Amare Haileslassie & Wolde Mekuria & Petra Schmitter & Stefan Uhlenbrook & Eva Ludi, 2020. "Changing Agricultural Landscapes in Ethiopia: Examining Application of Adaptive Management Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Issanchou, Alice, 2016. "Soil resource, at the core of competitiveness and sustainability issues in agriculture: an economic approach," Working Papers 230002, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:5:y:2013:i:7:p:227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.