Author
Listed:
- Manibhushan Manibhushan
- Nilanchal Patel
- Gadadhar Sahoo
- Anil Kumar Singh
Abstract
The aim of present research is to classify the satellite images of Ranchi area using fuzzy logic for different land use and land covers. An IRS-LISS III (Linear Imaging Self Scanning Sensor) image has been used for classification. Fuzzy logic is relatively a new theory. Now, fuzzy logic is widely used in the classification of remotely sensed images, for various land use and land cover classes. Classification of images includes pervious and impervious categories. Pervious categories contain mainly standing water bodies, natural vegetation and agricultural lands. Impervious categories contain dense built-up, moderate built-up and low density built-up area. The images of Ranchi area has been classified using standard maximum likelihood (ML) as well as fuzzy techniques using supervised method of classification using ERDAS IMAGINE 9.1. After classification of images, producer’s accuracy, user’s accuracy, overall accuracy and kappa coefficient values have been calculated with the help of confusion / error matrix. Result shows that in pervious category, standing water body exhibits highest accuracy (100%), then natural vegetation and agricultural land exhibits lowest accuracy. Standing water exhibits highest accuracy due to more clear pixels. Among the impervious categories, low density built-up area exhibits highest producer’s accuracy due to small area, dense built-up has second highest and moderate built-up has lowest producer’s accuracies. Comparison among accuracies have been done for both techniques and it is observed that the fuzzy logic is a better classification methodology than the standard ML method because overall accuracy and kappa value are higher for fuzzy classified images.
Suggested Citation
Manibhushan Manibhushan & Nilanchal Patel & Gadadhar Sahoo & Anil Kumar Singh, 2013.
"Image Classification for Different Land Use and Land Covers Using Fuzzy Logic for the Improvement of Accuracies,"
Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(3), pages 278-278, February.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:278
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.