Author
Listed:
- Daniel Rolando MartÃnez-Torres
- Cesáreo Landeros-Sánchez
- Alejandra Soto-Estrada
- Gustavo López-Romero
- Bladimir Vela-Lara
- Juan Carlos Moreno-Seceña
Abstract
The use of sugarcane varieties having high agroindustrial production, that are resistant to primary pests and diseases and are well adapted to regional conditions is a key factor for increasing the yield of this crop. The objective of this study was to agronomically and industrially evaluate a set of 12 sugarcane varieties in terms of their planting and ratoon cycles. This investigation used methodological protocols developed by the Instituto para el Mejoramiento de la Producción de Azúcar (IMPA) (Institute for the Improvement of Sugarcane Production) to assess the agroindustrial potential of new varieties. The 12 varieties were evaluated by testing them under the same management and climate conditions. An experimental design of completely randomized blocks and three replicates was used. Yield (t ha-1) and sucrose content (%) were assessed. There were no significant differences for yield (p > 0.05) with regard to planting cycle. Control variety Q-96 had the highest sucrose content (15.95%). For the ratoon cycle, the highest yield corresponded to variety L 73-65 with 178 t ha-1, and the lowest value was for variety HA 64-20 having 107 t ha-1. Variety Mex 91-662 had the greatest sucrose content (17.66%) and its yield (171 t ha-1) shows that this variety has great promise for the sugarcane zone supplying the El Modelo refinery and for the state of Veracruz.
Suggested Citation
Daniel Rolando MartÃnez-Torres & Cesáreo Landeros-Sánchez & Alejandra Soto-Estrada & Gustavo López-Romero & Bladimir Vela-Lara & Juan Carlos Moreno-Seceña, 2012.
"Agroindustrial Evaluation of Sugarcane Varieties in the Central Zone of Veracruz, Mexico,"
Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(1), pages 147-147, December.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:5:y:2012:i:1:p:147
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:5:y:2012:i:1:p:147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.