IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v4y2012i7p154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of Intercropping and Integrated Nutrition on Production Potential and Profitability on Rainfed Pigeonpea

Author

Listed:
  • Narendra Kumawat
  • Rajendra Prasad Singh
  • Rakesh Kumar
  • Anupma Kumari
  • Pramod Kumar

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif season 2008-09 and 2009 - 10 to evaluate the response of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] + blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) intercropping system to integrated nutrient levels. Intercropping failed to influence the dry matter production /plant, CEC of roots, root N content, yield and quality parameters of both crops. Both the intercropping system gives significantly higher uptake of N, P and K when compared to sole pigeonpea. The available soil N, P, K after harvest of crop (s) was maximum observed under sole pigeonpea followed by normal intercropping and lowest inpaired intercropping. Application of 100% RDF+50% RDN+5 kg Zn/ha significantly increased the dry matter production /plant,CEC of roots, root N content, grain yield, protein content, protein harvest (kg/ha) and nutrient uptake (NPKS and Zn) in pigeonpea and black gram cropping system. Integrated use 100% RDF with 50% RDN and 5 kg Zn/ha also significantly improved the available N, P and K soil after harvest during both the years.The maximum net return (Rs. 117010) was obtained with combination of normal intercropping system + 100% RDF+50% RDN+5 kg Zn/ha followed by normal intercropping system + 50% RDF+100% RDN+5 kg Zn/ha (Rs. 115102).

Suggested Citation

  • Narendra Kumawat & Rajendra Prasad Singh & Rakesh Kumar & Anupma Kumari & Pramod Kumar, 2012. "Response of Intercropping and Integrated Nutrition on Production Potential and Profitability on Rainfed Pigeonpea," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(7), pages 154-154, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:4:y:2012:i:7:p:154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/15743/11823
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/15743
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:4:y:2012:i:7:p:154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.