Author
Listed:
- Shuhuai Jiang
- Xiaoli Gao
- Jibao Liang
- Pengke Wang
- Jinfeng Gao
- Yang Qu
- Baili Feng
Abstract
In order to understand the effects of different furrow and mulched ridge combined farming practices on water moisture conversation and water saving of spring Mung bean planted farmland, the study investigated the soil water contents, yield, water use efficiencies and economic efficiencies of spring Mung bean under five different furrow and mulched ridge combined farming practices in two consecutive years. The study found that during the whole growth period of spring Mung bean, the two year average 0-100cm soil water storage under the different farming practices significantly increased by 7.96-22.76mm compared with that under the flat farming practice (T-Test P<0.05), respectively. The two-year average seed yield under the different farming practices significantly increased by 0.63%-24.53% compared with that under the flat farming practice respectively. The annual WUEs and yield-based incomes and net incomes under the different practices increased by30.03%-68.80% and 27.66%-51.16% and 28.99%-78.92% compared with those under the control practice, respectively; and at the same yield of Mung bean, the percentage of saved water and water saving efficiencies of Mung bean increased by 22.73%-40.38% and 339.48-603.12RMB Yuan /hm2 compared with those under the flat farming practice, respectively. The study indicated that double-furrow and mulched ridge combined water micro-collecting practice (practice 4) performed best in water retention and conservation, suitable to promote and adopt in semi arid regions and ecologically similar regions.
Suggested Citation
Shuhuai Jiang & Xiaoli Gao & Jibao Liang & Pengke Wang & Jinfeng Gao & Yang Qu & Baili Feng, 2012.
"Effect of Different Furrow and Mulched Ridge Combined Water Micro-collecting Practice on Moisture Retention and Water Saving of Spring Mung Bean-planted Farmland,"
Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(7), pages 132-132, May.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:4:y:2012:i:7:p:132
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:4:y:2012:i:7:p:132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.