IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v4y2012i5p61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Gustatory Repellent for Protection of Agricultural Land from Wild Boar Damage: An Investigation on Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian Schlageter
  • Daniel Haag-Wackernagel

Abstract

Following the spread and increase of wild boar populations in Europe during the last decades, conflicts with humans have intensified also in Switzerland. Damage to crops and grassland augmented considerably and became unacceptable. Farmers and authorities are highly interested in efficient alternatives to the installation of costly and time consuming electric fences for crop protection. In the present study we investigated the effectiveness of a gustative repellent in field experiments with free-ranging wild boars in clover sowings, meadows, and wheat fields. Although we observed a slight trend towards a damage reduction, the results show, that the repellent was not able to prevent damage at a significant level. We further could not detect any area avoidance by the wild boars as a response to the repellent. On the basis of our findings we conclude that gustative repellents relying on learned avoidance as a consequence of negative experience are not a promising means for protection of crops and grassland from wild boar damage. We further discuss the effects of different agricultural crops and the anthropogenic influence on the frequency of damage.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian Schlageter & Daniel Haag-Wackernagel, 2012. "A Gustatory Repellent for Protection of Agricultural Land from Wild Boar Damage: An Investigation on Effectiveness," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(5), pages 1-61, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:4:y:2012:i:5:p:61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/13225/10862
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/13225
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:4:y:2012:i:5:p:61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.