IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v16y2024i11p12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Crimson® NG Adjuvant on Glyphosate Efficacy in Corn

Author

Listed:
  • Nader Soltani
  • Christian A. Willemse
  • Peter H. Sikkema

Abstract

There is limited published data on the impact of the addition of Crimson® NG to glyphosate on weed control efficacy in corn under Ontario environmental conditions. Four field experiments were conducted at the University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, Ontario during 2022 and 2023 with two water sources to evaluate weed control with glyphosate alone and in combination with Crimson® NG. Glyphosate was applied at rates of 900, 1029, or 1221 g ae ha-1, with and without Crimson® NG at 1.0 and 2.5% v/v, using water with 56 ppm (Ridgetown) and 1600 ppm (Plattsville) hardness. Results showed that glyphosate at 900 g ae ha-1 controlled velvetleaf, Powell amaranth, common ragweed, common lambsquarters, barnyardgrass, and giant foxtail 97-100%, independent of water hardness. Neither increased glyphosate rates nor the addition of Crimson® NG significantly improved weed control. No corn injury was observed with all herbicide/adjuvant treatments evaluated. These findings confirm that glyphosate at 900 g ae ha-1 is highly effective for the control of common annual grass and broadleaf weeds. Weed control efficacy with glyphosate was not influenced by water source and there was no improvement in weed control efficacy from increasing the rate of glyphosate or from the addition of Crimson® NG.

Suggested Citation

  • Nader Soltani & Christian A. Willemse & Peter H. Sikkema, 2024. "Effect of Crimson® NG Adjuvant on Glyphosate Efficacy in Corn," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(11), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/50776/55034
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/50776
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.