IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v14y2024i12p59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parametric Models of Covariance Matrices for Repeated Measures: A Simulation Study on Fit, Error and Statistical Power in Mixed Linear Models

Author

Listed:
  • Lucas V. Vieira
  • Gabriela N. da Piedade
  • Maria M. P. Sartori

Abstract

The premise in experiments with repeated measures is that observations taken in the same experimental unit are correlated and that correlations decrease proportionally to the increase in the distance between measurements in time or space. Nevertheless, these experiments are often analyzed as if the correlations between the repeated measures were constant or using methods that only consider correlations different, which may impact on the rejection rate of the null hypothesis, and ultimately type I error rate and statistical power. In this context, this study investigated the application of mixed linear models with different assumptions about the covariance matrix in data sets from simulated experiments with repeated measures. 84 scenarios that varied in terms of the covariance matrix pattern (14 structures), number of repeated measurements (4 and 8) and sample size (4, 8 and 12) were evaluated. 10,000 data sets were simulated for each scenario based on a multivariate normal distribution and were subsequently analyzed using mixed linear models. Type I error rate and statistical power for the hypothesis test of the interaction between treatments and repeated measures were estimated as the proportion of p values less than or equal to 0.01 or 0.05 out of a total of 10,000 tests for each scenario. The models were also evaluated for their ability to fit the data using Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC). Thus, the frequency with which the covariance structures were chosen by the selection criteria was computed. Results indicate that the assumption chosen most frequently by the information criteria resulted from the specified covariance structure that corresponded to the empirical covariance structure of the analyzed data sets, particularly for those with larger number of repeated measures and sample sizes. Results also indicate that the use of covariance models that do not recognize heterogeneous correlations between repeated measures can inflate type I error or reduce it to very conservative levels, which may affect the conclusion of agricultural experiments. For a 5% significance level, type I error bias was greater than 2α, while for 1% significance level, bias was over 5α. In addition, the statistical power was reduced when the assumption about the covariance matrix of the data sets did not correspond to the empirical covariance structure, particularly for those data sets with a smaller sample size.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas V. Vieira & Gabriela N. da Piedade & Maria M. P. Sartori, 2024. "Parametric Models of Covariance Matrices for Repeated Measures: A Simulation Study on Fit, Error and Statistical Power in Mixed Linear Models," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(12), pages 1-59, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/48020/51594
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/48020/51593
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/48020
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.