Author
Listed:
- Nélio Ranieli F. Paula
- Érica O. Araújo
- Emily E. Almeida
- Aretha Steffany da Silva Rezende
Abstract
The production of fermented milk added of fruits is a considerable alternative for dairy industries and can constitute a rational and logical form of different types of processing, in various flavors, being part of a promising market in the Brazilian scenario. In view of the above, the present study aimed to research the biotechnological processes of production of fermented milk with different blends of cupuaçu (Theobroma grandiflorum) and cocoa (Theobroma cacao). The experimental design used was completely randomized, with six treatments, consisting of different concentrations of pulp (blends) of cocoa and cupuaçu (T1- 100% cupuaçu, T2- 100% cocoa, T3- 50% cupuaçu + 50% cocoa, T4- 60% cupuaçu + 40% cocoa, T5- 70% cupuaçu + 30% cocoa, and T6- 80% cupuaçu + 20% cocoa) and four replicates. The results showed that the production of fermented milk added with 100% cocoa and 70% cupuaçu + 30% cocoa showed good lightness, yellowish color, slight sweetness and moderate acidity, according to the data of a*, b*, %Brix and pH. Fermented milk added of 100% cupuaçu, 70% cupuaçu + 30% cocoa and 60% cupuaçu + 40% cocoa had greater acceptability in regard to color and texture, while fermented milk added of 70% cupuaçu + 30% cocoa had the highest values of acceptability for aroma and flavor. The production of fermented milk with the use of different regional raw materials is feasible, because there is great potential as a sustainable alternative, and the addition of pulp of Amazonian fruits promotes greater nutritional and sensory value in fermented milk, contributing to the regional economy.
Suggested Citation
Nélio Ranieli F. Paula & Érica O. Araújo & Emily E. Almeida & Aretha Steffany da Silva Rezende, 2024.
"Physicochemical and Sensory Quality of Fermented Milk With Different Blends of Theobroma grandiflorum and Theobroma cacao,"
Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(5), pages 131-131, April.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:12:y:2024:i:5:p:131
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:12:y:2024:i:5:p:131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.