IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v12y2024i12p144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Plants Showing Antagonism to Five Plant Pathogenic Fungi

Author

Listed:
  • M. E. N. Ferreira
  • C. F. Pinto
  • R. R. de Sena
  • J. G. de Mendoça Neto
  • C. R. Lobo
  • L. E. Chagas
  • D. L. da Silva
  • E. M. dos Santos
  • F. H. C. Santos
  • F. A. M. Nakamura
  • Eder Marques

Abstract

Fungi are among the main agents of plant diseases, being responsible for major losses in agriculture. The control of these microorganisms carried out using chemical compounds and numerous cases of resistance have already been observed, which makes it necessary to search for alternative methods of management of these pathogens. Therefore, the aim of this study, to evaluate the antifungal potential in plants. Twenty-four (24) plant extracts were tested for their antifungal potential against five plant pathogenic fungi- Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Ss), Stromatinia cepivora (Sc), Fusarium oxysporum (Fox), Colletotrichum gloesporioides (Cg) and Verticillium dahlia (Vd). For the evaluation of the fungicidal potential, plant extracts were prepared by liquefying the plants in distilled water. The extracts were incorporated into PDA (Potato-Dextrose-Agar) culture medium to a final concentration of 35% and autoclaved. Then, PDA discs colonized by the aforementioned fungi were added to the center of each plate with the respective treatments (plant extracts). When all control treatments (PDA medium without plant extract) had colonized the entire Petri dish, the diameters of the fungal colonies were measured to calculate the Mycelial Growth Inhibition Index (MGI). Tests showed that all these plant extracts have some antifungal activity, ranging from 0 to 100% inhibition. In general, extracts of basil, lavender, guaco, rue, toxic cassava and black plum were the ones that stood out, with MGIs above 50%. New studies are being conducted to evaluate the activity of plant extracts without autoclaving, inhibition of sclerotia formation, to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration, as well as other parts of plants like roots and seeds, mixtures of plant extracts and in vivo antagonism tests.

Suggested Citation

  • M. E. N. Ferreira & C. F. Pinto & R. R. de Sena & J. G. de Mendoça Neto & C. R. Lobo & L. E. Chagas & D. L. da Silva & E. M. dos Santos & F. H. C. Santos & F. A. M. Nakamura & Eder Marques, 2024. "Some Plants Showing Antagonism to Five Plant Pathogenic Fungi," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 144-144, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:12:y:2024:i:12:p:144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/44156/46493
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/44156
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:12:y:2024:i:12:p:144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.