IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v11y2024i2p286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Row Arrangements of Maize and Soybean Intercrop on Silage Quality and Grain Yield

Author

Listed:
  • Vanderson Vieira Batista
  • Paulo Fernando Adami
  • Pedro Valério Dutra de Moraes
  • Karine Fuschter Oligini
  • Cleverson Luiz Giacomel
  • Lucas Link

Abstract

The success of maize + soybean intercrop depends on the plant arrangement. An experiment was carried out to evaluate different row arrangements on intercrop forage yield, silage quality and maize grain yield in relation to maize as a sole crop. The experiment was set up with a randomized complete block design with eight row arrangements between maize and Soybean. Maize biomass yield among crop arrangements were similar, although, lower than the maize sole crop. On the other hand, these treatments showed higher soybean biomass yield, which in turn increased silage crude protein and crude protein yield per unit area. Maize thousand grain weight, grain yield per plant and per area was affected by the intercrop arrangements. The use of two corn rows + two soybean rows (2M+2S-30 cm) and four corn rows + four soybean rows (4M+4S-30 cm) showed higher crude protein yield per area associated with similar maize grain yield in relation to the sole maize crop. In conclusion, alternating four maize rows with four soybean rows was the optimum row ratio in maize + soybean intercrop, though this needs to be further confirmed by more trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanderson Vieira Batista & Paulo Fernando Adami & Pedro Valério Dutra de Moraes & Karine Fuschter Oligini & Cleverson Luiz Giacomel & Lucas Link, 2024. "Row Arrangements of Maize and Soybean Intercrop on Silage Quality and Grain Yield," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 286-286, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/38103/38593
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/38103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.