IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v11y2024i18p21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive Perception Approach of Adoption: Experimenting Hybrid Chinese Maize Varieties in Benin

Author

Listed:
  • Houinsou Dedehouanou
  • Antoine Affokpon
  • Rachidatou Sikirou
  • Noël Akissoe
  • Chabi G. Yallou
  • Jean-Louis Ahounou
  • François-Xavier Akondé
  • Antoine Badou
  • Jacqueline Sagbohan

Abstract

The probability of adoption of four Chinese Hybrid Varieties of maize is considered as a favorable perception for these varieties by actors. In order to understand the way of adoption, a panel of actors comprising producers, processors, traders, extension officers, local elected representatives and, above all, end-users, was used as enumerator to evaluate the behavior of those varieties in comparison to the reference maize varieties known as “local” in experiment plots during the vegetative, harvesting and processing phases. For each actor surveyed and for each introduced variety, the comparative index of appreciation (IA) was determined by the difference in perception scores with respect to each of the descriptors evaluated. The adoption of maize varieties within the sites surveyed was affected by the respondent’ social profile (title), the number of varieties already adopted by the respondent, respondent’s experience, age, educational background, membership to an association/organization and the site (research station). The estimation of adoption relative to probabilities (odds ratio) of each variety of maize from the binary logistic regression models revealed only one variety having more than one in two chances for being adopted. Unlike the adoption rate of maize varieties calculated after expensive dissemination efforts, the analysis of probabilities and determinants of adoption somewhat reduces research, pre-extension and extension efforts. The proposed approach allows for a flexible integration of research experiments and field extension concerns of the process of adoption by creating panels of stakeholders around research experiments on research stations.

Suggested Citation

  • Houinsou Dedehouanou & Antoine Affokpon & Rachidatou Sikirou & Noël Akissoe & Chabi G. Yallou & Jean-Louis Ahounou & François-Xavier Akondé & Antoine Badou & Jacqueline Sagbohan, 2024. "Comprehensive Perception Approach of Adoption: Experimenting Hybrid Chinese Maize Varieties in Benin," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(18), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:11:y:2024:i:18:p:21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/41197/42594
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/41197
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimara, Efthalia & Skuras, Dimitris, 2003. "Adoption of agricultural innovations as a two-stage partial observability process," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 187-196, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Läpple, Doris & Renwick, Alan & Thorne, Fiona, 2015. "Measuring and understanding the drivers of agricultural innovation: Evidence from Ireland," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-8.
    2. Wollni, Meike & Andersson, Camilla, 2014. "Spatial patterns of organic agriculture adoption: Evidence from Honduras," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 120-128.
    3. Valera, Harold Glenn & Yamano, Takashi & Pede, Valerien & Puskur, Ranjitha & Habib, Muhammad Ashraful & Bashar, Khairul, 2021. "Impact of Nutrition Training on Long-Term Adoption of High Zinc Rice: A Randomized Control Trial Study Among Female Farmers in Bangladesh," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315165, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Aliou Diagne, 2012. "Adoption: a new Stata routine for estimating consistently population technological adoption parameters," SAN12 Stata Conference 17, Stata Users Group.
    5. Obubuafo, Joyce & Gillespie, Jeffrey & Paudel, Krishna & Kim, Seon-Ae, 2008. "Awareness of and Application to the Environmental Quality Incentives Program By Cow—Calf Producers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 357-368, April.
    6. Li, Bowei & Shen, Yueqin, 2021. "Effects of land transfer quality on the application of organic fertilizer by large-scale farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    7. Ismail Moumouni & Mohamed N. Baco & Latifou Idrissou, 2019. "Towards a Re-Conceptualization of the Pathway of Agricultural Technology for a Better Impact Assessment," International Journal of Publication and Social Studies, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(2), pages 123-131, June.
    8. Ya-na Wang & Lifu Jin & Hanping Mao, 2019. "Farmer Cooperatives’ Intention to Adopt Agricultural Information Technology—Mediating Effects of Attitude," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 565-580, June.
    9. Diagne, Aliou, 2006. "Taking a New Look at Empirical Models of Adoption: Average Treatment Effect Estimation of Adoption Rates and their Determinants," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25623, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Shibia, Mumina Guyo, 2010. "Evaluation of Economic Losses in Rearing Replacement Heifers in Pastoral and Peri-Urban Camel Herds of Isiolo District, Kenya," Research Theses 134493, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    11. Lidia Dandedjrohoun & Aliou Diagne & Gauthier Biaou & Simon N’cho & Soul-Kifouly Midingoyi, 2012. "Determinants of diffusion and adoption of improved technology for rice parboiling in Benin," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 93(2), pages 171-191.
    12. Han, Zhongya & Tang, Zhongjun & He, Bo, 2022. "Improved Bass model for predicting the popularity of product information posted on microblogs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    13. Diagne, Aliou & Sogbossi, Marie-Josee & Simtowe, Franklin & Diawara, Sekou & Diallo, Abdoulaye Sadio & Barry, Alpha Bacar, 2009. "Estimation of Actual and potential adoption rates and determinants of a new technology not universally known in the population: The case of NERICA rice varieties in Guinea," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51644, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. F. Vidogbéna & A. Adégbidi & R. Tossou & F. Assogba-Komlan & T. Martin & M. Ngouajio & S. Simon & L. Parrot & S. T. Garnett & K. K. Zander, 2016. "Exploring factors that shape small-scale farmers’ opinions on the adoption of eco-friendly nets for vegetable production," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1749-1770, December.
    15. Oksana Hrynevych & Miguel Blanco Canto & Mercedes Jiménez García, 2022. "Tendencies of Precision Agriculture in Ukraine: Disruptive Smart Farming Tools as Cooperation Drivers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Kuntner, Tobias & Teichert, Thorsten, 2017. "Price Promotions: Enablers or Obstacles for Brand-Led Innovation Adoption – A Double-Hurdle Approach," EconStor Preprints 157297, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    17. Bjerke, Lina & Johansson, Sara, 2022. "Innovation in agriculture: An analysis of Swedish agricultural and non-agricultural firms," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Bonjean, Isabelle, 2017. "Heterogeneous Gains From Agricultural Innovation Adoption: The Role Of The Price Effect In Peru," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 260891, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Franklin SIMTOWE & Elijah MUANGE, 2013. "The Diffusion and Adoption of Green Revolution Technologies: Lessons and policy implications from Pigeonpea farmers in Kenya," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 13(2), pages 161-178.
    20. Shuhong Wang & Ning Yin & Zhihai Yang, 2021. "Factors affecting sustained adoption of irrigation water-saving technologies in groundwater over-exploited areas in the North China Plain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 10528-10546, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:11:y:2024:i:18:p:21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.