IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v11y2024i17p158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of CO2 Emission From Rice Husk Biochar and Cowdung Manure Co-compost Preparation

Author

Listed:
  • E. Y. Thomas
  • S. G. K. Adiku
  • C. J. Atkinson
  • J. A. I. Omueti
  • D. S. Marcarthy

Abstract

Composting of animal manure had been considered a sustainable alternative method for recycling organic waste. However the process involved had been associated with greenhouse gas emission (CO2, N2O and CH4) which play an active role in global warming. This study evaluated CO2 emissions from biochar-manure co-compost production. Biochar (from rice husk) and manure were mixed in a ratio of 3-1 v/v to achieve a range of different co-compost mixtures. The treatments and controls in triplicates of 18 units were arranged in a complete randomize design. All treatments were incubated at around 28 oC and turned every two days for 2 weeks, and later five days for 39 days. CO2 production in the compost bins was measured by trapping the evolved gas in 5M NaOH. Total CO2 emissions varied over time with higher rates at the beginning of the composting process. Within the first 7 days, total CO2 emissions (587 mg/m2) from cow dung alone was not significantly different from cow dung plus biochar (506 mg/m2). At the latter stages of the composting process, CO2 emission from cowdung and biochar mixture was less than from the other treatments.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Y. Thomas & S. G. K. Adiku & C. J. Atkinson & J. A. I. Omueti & D. S. Marcarthy, 2024. "Evaluation of CO2 Emission From Rice Husk Biochar and Cowdung Manure Co-compost Preparation," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(17), pages 158-158, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:11:y:2024:i:17:p:158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/40808/42121
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/40808
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:11:y:2024:i:17:p:158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.