IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v11y2019i14p205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods for Estimating Optimum Plot Size for ‘Gigante’ Cactus Pear

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno V. C. Guimarães
  • Sérgio L. R. Donato
  • Ignacio Aspiazú
  • Alcinei M. Azevedo
  • Abner J. de Carvalho

Abstract

The optimum plot size for ‘Gigante’ cactus pear can be estimated by several methods; thus, ultimately aiming for efficiency, simple use and high precision, the objective of this study was to compare methods for estimating plot sizes- modified maximum curvature method, Hatheway’s convenient plot size method, linear and quadratic response plateau models, and comparison of variances method for evaluating phenotypic characteristics in experiments with ‘Gigante’ cactus pear. Plot sizes were estimated by conducting a uniformity trial. Estimated optimum plot sizes varied with the method and vegetative characteristic. The quadratic response plateau regression estimated the largest plot sizes, whereas Hatheway’s method estimated the smallest plot sizes. Comparison of variances method estimated intermediate plot sizes in comparison with the other methods for most measured characteristics. Plots sizes estimated by modified maximum curvature method are more consistent with results reported by studies on ‘Gigante’ cactus pear. 10 basic unit plot sizes estimated by the linear response plateau model can be used with high precision and practical feasibility for growing cactus pear, thereby improving the use of resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno V. C. Guimarães & Sérgio L. R. Donato & Ignacio Aspiazú & Alcinei M. Azevedo & Abner J. de Carvalho, 2019. "Methods for Estimating Optimum Plot Size for ‘Gigante’ Cactus Pear," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(14), pages 205-205, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:11:y:2019:i:14:p:205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/40369/41528
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/40369
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:11:y:2019:i:14:p:205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.