Author
Listed:
- Aline das G. Souza
- Andressa L. de Brida
- Flávio R. M. Garcia
- Valmor J. Bianchi
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to carry out a search for phytonematodes to verify the abundance and frequency of nematodes present in a peach orchard at eight years of age. Soil and root samples from nine peach rootstocks were collected in an experimental area in the district of Capão do Leão, in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. After extraction, the samples were evaluated under an optical microscope. Nematodes of the following genera were identified in the samples- Meloidogyne spp., Pratylenchus spp., Helicotylenchus spp., Mesocriconema spp., Trichodorus spp., Longydorus spp., Tylenchorchynchus spp., Hemiciclyophora spp., Xiphinema spp., Tylenchulus spp., Dorylaimus spp., Rotylenchulus spp. and Mononchus spp., all associated with the roots or soil rhizosphere of ‘Aldrighi’, ‘Capdeboscq’, ‘Flordaguard’, ‘Nemaguard’, ‘Okinawa’, ‘Tusukuba’, ‘Umezeiro’, ‘Viamão’ and ‘Industry’ rootstocks. The most frequent phytoparasitic nematodes were Meloidogyne spp., and Mesocriconema spp., which, under high populations or under inadequate management of the cultivated area, represent a risk to peach cultivation. Xiphinema and Pratylenchus are two other phytonematodes that can cause damage to peach trees and were identified in greater abundance in the ‘Industry’, ‘Viamão’ and ‘Nemaguard’ rootstocks. Under the conditions of the present research the ‘Okinawa’ and ‘Umezeiro’ rootstocks proved to be unfavourable hosts, especially for Meloidogyne spp. and Mesocriconema spp. The ‘Viamão’, ‘Capdeboscq’, ‘Aldrighi’ and particularly the ‘Industry’ rootstcks should not be recommended for use in areas with an incidence of the nematodes Meloidogyne spp. or Mesocriconema spp.
Suggested Citation
Aline das G. Souza & Andressa L. de Brida & Flávio R. M. Garcia & Valmor J. Bianchi, 2019.
"Prospecting for Nematodes Associated With Different Prunus Rootstocks in Brazil,"
Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(11), pages 253-253, July.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:11:y:2019:i:11:p:253
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:11:y:2019:i:11:p:253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.