Author
Listed:
- Waleska S. G. de Carvalho
- Cláudia S. Marinho
- Mayara B. de S. Arantes
- Glaziele Campbell
- Bruno D. Amaral
- Maura Da Cunha
Abstract
Poncirus trifoliata var. monstrosa (T. Ito) Swingle is a rootstock used in Brazilian citriculture for its potential to induce dwarfism and the viability of densified crops. Its recommendation is still restricted due to lack of research on the performance and compatibility of different types of scion under specific conditions of soil and climate. The aim of this study was to correlate plant size and productive efficiency with anatomical indicators of dwarfism or graft incompatibility between citrus scion cultivars and the ‘Flying Dragon’ trifoliate orange (FD) and ‘Rangpur Lime’ (RL) as rootstocks. The experimental design was of randomised blocks with split plots, with the experiment conducted in an orchard from the fourth to the sixth year of cultivation, under localised irrigation. The treatments consisted of two rootstocks (FD and RL) in the plots and five scion cultivars (Tahiti acid lime, and Natal, Navel, Lima Sorocaba and Pera oranges) in the sub-plots, with four replications per treatment. The agronomic performance of the plants was evaluated, together with the characteristics of samples containing the cambial zone and secondary xylem below, above and within the graft region. The FD rootstock gives the smallest size and greatest productive efficiency. The ‘Navel’ orange has good anatomical plasticity, adjusting itself more efficiently to the rootstocks. Visual symptoms of incompatibility between the ‘Pera’ orange grafted onto the FD can be seen at 64 months after planting. Vessel size and frequency, as well as the size and disposition of the cambial zone, are related to dwarfism and graft incompatibility.
Suggested Citation
Waleska S. G. de Carvalho & Cláudia S. Marinho & Mayara B. de S. Arantes & Glaziele Campbell & Bruno D. Amaral & Maura Da Cunha, 2018.
"Agronomic and Anatomical Indicators of Dwarfism and Graft Incompatibility in Citrus Plants,"
Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(9), pages 263-263, August.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:263
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.