IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v10y2018i9p217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Different Methods for Assessing Chlorophyll Content in Citrus

Author

Listed:
  • Rivani Oliveira Ferreira
  • Marilza Neves do Nascimento
  • Luciano da Silva Souza
  • Felipe Gomes Frederico da Silveira
  • Roberto Toyohiro Shibata

Abstract

The content of chlorophyll-Chl present in green vegetables is strongly associated with the momentary state of the plant photosynthesis. Conventionally, determination of chlorophyll is by extraction with organic solvents and determining a spectrophotometer, and this method expensive, laborious and moreover a destructive method. Thus, the use of portable equipment has been used instead, as they allow studies without destruction of leaf tissue and obtaining instantaneous measurements. Thus, the aim of correlating the chlorophyll results obtained in the laboratory with Falker Chlorophyll Index (FCI) obtained by the ClorofiLog in different citrus rootstocks, as well asits relationship to soil moisture content variation. Positive simple correlations (linear Pearson correlation) were obtained for chl a, b and total, with the lowest correlation values observed for chl β, which ranged from 0.470-788 among the analyzed rootstocks. The coefficients of determination for the three variables chl α, β and total α+β showed a better fit by the polynomial regression model in all analyzed rootstocks; in general, the best results were for chl α, ranging from 0.7093-0.8551. The results indicate the usefulness of the ChloroflLog apparatus in the indirect determination of chlorophyll content in citrus.

Suggested Citation

  • Rivani Oliveira Ferreira & Marilza Neves do Nascimento & Luciano da Silva Souza & Felipe Gomes Frederico da Silveira & Roberto Toyohiro Shibata, 2018. "Comparison of Different Methods for Assessing Chlorophyll Content in Citrus," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(9), pages 217-217, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/75176/42690
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/75176
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.