IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijspjl/v14y2025i1p29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Two Independent Groups: Inferences About the Lower and Upper Tails of the Distribution of D = X − Y

Author

Listed:
  • Rand R. Wilcox
  • Carla Sanchis-Segura

Abstract

When comparing two independent groups, a way of getting a more detailed understanding of how the groups compare is to focus on multiple quantiles rather than a single measure of location. There are two distinct approaches regarding how this might be done. The first is to estimate a collection of quantiles for each group and choose an appropriate inferential method for comparing them. This approach has been studied extensively. For example, Doksum and Sievers (1976) derived a nonparametric method for computing confidence intervals for the difference between all quantiles for which the simultaneous probability coverage can be determined exactly assuming random sampling only. An analog of the Doksum–Sievers method was derive by Lombard (2005), which is based on the marginal distributions of two dependent groups. Other methods and applications are described in Wilcox (2023). Let X and Y denote two independent random variables and let D = X − Y. Note that under general conditions, the q quantile of D is not equal to the q quantile of X minus the q quantile of Y. Methods for making inferences about the median of D have been studied that have a close connection to the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. Here, four methods are suggested and studied via simulations that are aimed at making inferences about the tails of the distribution D with the goal of providing a deeper and more nuanced understanding of how groups compare.

Suggested Citation

  • Rand R. Wilcox & Carla Sanchis-Segura, 2025. "Comparing Two Independent Groups: Inferences About the Lower and Upper Tails of the Distribution of D = X − Y," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 1-29, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijspjl:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijsp/article/download/0/0/51515/56009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijsp/article/view/0/51515
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijspjl:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.