IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijspjl/v13y2025i4p18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Invariance of Chi-squared Tests Under Different Probability Models

Author

Listed:
  • Khairul Islam
  • Tanweer J. Shapla

Abstract

A chi-squared test is a popular test for assessing relationship between two factors or categorical variables summarized in the form of a contingency table. In this study, we establish the invariance of a chi-squared test under three different study designs, namely, cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies involving distinct probabilistic models. By the invariance of the chi-squared test, we refer to the fact that the form of a chi-squared test remains unchanged under different probabilistic models. The theoretical derivation of expected cell frequencies carried out in this study, under different study designs and probability models, will be exemplary and invaluable to researchers to understand as to why they can use an identical form of the chi-squared test for a contingency table resulting from case-control, cohort or cross-sectional study design for testing independence. This study is also useful in academia to demonstrate why contingency table resulting under different study designs is subject to identical form of a chi-squared test, which has not been well documented in existing literature. The examples and applications utilized in this study provide directions as to how differently formulated studies are implemented via a chi-squared test.

Suggested Citation

  • Khairul Islam & Tanweer J. Shapla, 2025. "On Invariance of Chi-squared Tests Under Different Probability Models," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijspjl:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijsp/article/download/0/0/51021/55332
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijsp/article/view/0/51021
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijspjl:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.