IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijpsjl/v9y2017i3p51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Satisfaction Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Two Models of Specialty-Oriented Career Planning Course

Author

Listed:
  • Huiling Peng
  • Yueh-Hsiang Lin
  • Chun-Ju Lin

Abstract

This research is a two-semester experimental program that uses Freshman’s “Finance Career Planning†of the undergraduate program of the finance department of the National Taipei University of Business (NTUB) as the experimental curriculum. This research explores and analyzes two models of “Specialty-oriented career planning course†to see if there is a difference in students’ course satisfaction. The features of the second model include specialty-oriented lectures by finance alumni and assignments requiring the interviewing of upperclassmen, in addition to studying career counseling theory and specialty-topic content sharing. This research finds that there is a significant difference in students’ course satisfaction within the two models of “specialty-oriented career planning course†, wherein the second model is considered better than the first model, and the average scores of the five indicators of students’ course satisfaction have all reached a significant level (the richness of course content, the clarity of lecturer’s conveyance, the level of personal learning acquirement, the relevancy of course content to the topic, the design of course process and activities). This research proposes the following recommendations, in accordance with the research findings, that institutions of higher education should offer practical and feasible specialty-oriented career planning courses.

Suggested Citation

  • Huiling Peng & Yueh-Hsiang Lin & Chun-Ju Lin, 2017. "Satisfaction Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Two Models of Specialty-Oriented Career Planning Course," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 1-51, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/download/69912/38063
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/view/69912
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huiling Peng & Shyue-Ying Chiang, 2018. "Action Research on College Students’ Learning Satisfaction of Incorporating Art Therapy and Spirituality into A Career Planning Course," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 1-38, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.