IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v14y2022i12p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Impact of Energy Efficiency Policies: A Scenario Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Massimo Beccarello
  • Giacomo Di Foggia

Abstract

The number of countries that have pledged to uphold the 2050 decarbonization targets is constantly growing, and many have established strategies and planned related investments for the coming years. The economic impact of decarbonization and energy efficiency policies has become a major topic of discussion in the global effort to mitigate climate change and contain the temperature rise to less than 2 degrees. Previous literature has identified the risks and opportunities of decarbonization policies, especially concerning the rebound effects and the situation that may arise if, due to persistent biases and the costs of fulfilling climate policies, industries were to transfer production to countries where laxer emission constraints are in force. At the core of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is the Sustainable Development Goals, which are a global call for action regardless of countries’ level of economic development. With Goal 12 on sustainable production and consumption and Goal 14 on climate change mitigation in mind, we provide an economic impact analysis of decarbonization and energy efficiency policies. We compare two scenarios based on the Italian context. The reference scenario is a simulation that shows the development of energy-efficient technologies if the targets set in the national energy strategy were to be met without additional binding targets being added. The policy scenario sees energy efficiency as the principal driver of decarbonization in the presence of a national emissions constraint lasting until 2030, as envisaged by the European Commission. The results confirm that certain risks and opportunities arise from effective policymaking. The effects of decarbonization and energy efficiency policies in the reference scenario would increase final demand by approximately €278.34 billion and the policy scenario would increase it by approximately €380.36 billion by 2030.

Suggested Citation

  • Massimo Beccarello & Giacomo Di Foggia, 2022. "Economic Impact of Energy Efficiency Policies: A Scenario Analysis," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(12), pages 1-1, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/0/0/47892/51427
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/0/47892
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. A. Shirov, 2018. "Use of Input–Output Approach for Supporting Decisions in the Field of Economic Policy," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 588-597, November.
    2. Di Foggia, Giacomo, 2021. "Energy-Efficient Products and Competitiveness in the Manufacturing Sector," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(1).
    3. Stede, Jan, 2017. "Bridging the industrial energy efficiency gap – Assessing the evidence from the Italian white certificate scheme," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 112-123.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. S. V. Chepel, 2023. "Modeling the Environmental Macrostructural and Social Impacts of Reducing Energy Subsidies (by the Example of Uzbekistan)," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 713-723, October.
    2. Massimo Beccarello & Giacomo Di Foggia, 2023. "Review and Perspectives of Key Decarbonization Drivers to 2030," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giacomo Di Foggia & Massimo Beccarello & Marco Borgarello & Francesca Bazzocchi & Stefano Moscarelli, 2022. "Market-Based Instruments to Promote Energy Efficiency: Insights from the Italian Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Liping Liao & Chukun Huang & Minzhe Du, 2022. "The Effect of Energy Quota Trading on Energy Saving in China: Insight from a Quasi-Natural Experiment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Beccarello, Massimo & Di Foggia, Giacomo, 2023. "Meeting decarbonization targets: Techno-economic insights from the Italian scenario," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 2.
    4. Jan Stede, 2019. "Do Energy Efficiency Networks Save Energy? Evidence from German Plant-Level Data," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1813, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    5. Chankook Park, 2022. "Expansion of servitization in the energy sector and its implications," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), July.
    6. Giacomo Di Foggia & Massimo Beccarello, 2021. "Market Structure of Urban Waste Treatment and Disposal: Empirical Evidence from the Italian Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Wang, Kaike & Su, Xuewei & Wang, Shuhong, 2023. "How does the energy-consuming rights trading policy affect China's carbon emission intensity?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    8. Bogdan Wit & Piotr Dresler & Anna Surma-Syta, 2021. "Innovation in Start-Up Business Model in Energy-Saving Solutions for Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Mehdi Bensouda & Mimoun Benali, 2023. "The Role of Institutional Pressure and Dynamic Capabilities in Promoting Energy Efficiency Practices: Evidence from the Moroccan Manufacturing Sector," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(1), pages 352-361, January.
    10. Hesselink, Laurens X.W. & Chappin, Emile J.L., 2019. "Adoption of energy efficient technologies by households – Barriers, policies and agent-based modelling studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 29-41.
    11. L. A. Strizhkova & G. R. Islamova & S. I. Kashirskaya, 2022. "Intercountry Input–Output Table of the Eurasian Economic Union as a Component of the Tools for Analysis and Forecasting of Its Economy," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 135-148, April.
    12. Claudio F. Carpio & Marina Yesica Recalde, 2021. "Learning energy efficiency networks in Latin America: Lessons learned from the Argentinean case," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(3), May.
    13. E. A. Edinak, 2020. "Estimating Total Labor Input for Supporting Informed Economic Policy Decisions," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 655-662, November.
    14. Du, Minzhe & Wu, Fenger & Ye, Danfeng & Zhao, Yating & Liao, Liping, 2023. "Exploring the effects of energy quota trading policy on carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    15. Massimo Beccarello & Giacomo Di Foggia, 2023. "Review and Perspectives of Key Decarbonization Drivers to 2030," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, January.
    16. D. N. Shul’ts & P. A. Lavrinenko, 2020. "Assessment of the Economic Impacts of Reducing Transportation Costs Based on DSGE Modeling," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 549-558, September.
    17. A. M. Kalinin & S. S. Koroteev & A. A. Krupin & A. V. Nefedov, 2021. "Technological Import Dependence of the Russian Economy: An Assessment Using Input–Output Tables," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 52-58, January.
    18. Safarzadeh, Soroush & Hafezalkotob, Ashkan & Jafari, Hamed, 2022. "Energy supply chain empowerment through tradable green and white certificates: A pathway to sustainable energy generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    19. Marco Schletz & Ana Cardoso & Gabriela Prata Dias & Søren Salomo, 2020. "How Can Blockchain Technology Accelerate Energy Efficiency Interventions? A Use Case Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    20. A. P. Potapov, 2021. "The Use of Input–Output Tables in the Study of the Dynamics and Structure of the Resource Intensity of Agricultural Production," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 177-183, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.