IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v11y2019i1p28-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reasons of the Difference of Murabaha Accounting Standards in Islamic Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Fuad Al-Fasfus

Abstract

This study investigates the reasons of the difference of murabaha accounting data in the Islamic banks. It depends on the analysis of the murabaha’s contract and compares between resources that affect accounting data. Investigation includes different resources of applying different accounting data of traditional account standards and fiqh pricing rules, it also investigates the difference of murabaha and the developed accounting depends on murabaha’s flexible accounting data. Researchers found that there are many resources that affect murabaha accounting data which give the director of Islamic bank choices. Fiqh pricing rule is voluntary factor for director which limits accounting data. Fiqh rule will rule murabaha of developing acceptance and flexible murabaha managing gives fair to accounting data and evaluation. There is need to limit ignorance of following fiqh. Fiqh pricing is the way to promote murabaha in Islamic bank and fixe accounting data policies to avoid accounting errors; also it limits evaluation to get fair of financing performance result’, Researchers ask to fix accounting data by suggesting model to unified Islamic accounting data and to explain the reason of the change account data of fiqh.

Suggested Citation

  • Fuad Al-Fasfus, 2019. "Reasons of the Difference of Murabaha Accounting Standards in Islamic Banks," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 28-36, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:28-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/0/0/37754/38430
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/0/37754
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shaikh, Salman Ahmed, 2011. "A critical analysis of Mudarabah & a new approach to equity financing in Islamic finance," MPRA Paper 19697, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wesal M. Aldarabseh, 2019. "The Interest in Islamic Finance Contracts in Saudi Arabia as Viewed by Google Trends," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Abdullah Ibrahim Nazal & Fuad Al-Fasfus, 2018. "Impact of Liquidity Rules on Shareholders’ Returns in Jordan Islamic Bank," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(6), pages 225-225, April.
    3. EL Fakir, Adil & Fairchild, Richard & Tkiouat, Mohamed, 2019. "A hybrid profit and loss sharing model using interest free-debt and equity financing: An application of game theory as a decision tool," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 352-360.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9551 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Adil EL Fakir & Mohamed Tkiouat, 2016. "Single or Menu Contracting: A Game Theory Application of the Hersanyi Model to Mudaraba Financing," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(1), pages 221-230.
    6. Kaouther Jouaber & Meryem Mehri, 2012. "A Theory of Profit Sharing Ratio under Adverse Selection: The Case of Islamic Venture Capital," Post-Print hal-01525795, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    financial inclusion; Granger causality test; impulse response analysis; Johansen¡¯s cointegration test; macroeconomic factors; private participation investment; unit root; vector auto regression;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:28-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.