Author
Listed:
- Valentina Cioli
- Roberto Bianchini
- Alessandro Giannozzi
- Oliviero Roggi
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that people when making investment decisions, evaluate risk according to their perception of eco-friendly commitment. These studies claim that preference to green investment influences prices and trading behaviour in market settings. Assets perceived greener on average trade at significantly higher prices with different performance between sovereign and corporate green bonds (Ehlers and Packer, 2017). Our paper refers to a sample of 5996 bond at world level divided equally in ordinary bond and green bonds. We tested a set of models to assess this new factor. The results confirm the presence of greenium, but it highlights that corporate bonds’ greenium is higher than sovereign one. Moreover, in developed markets, green bonds tend to exhibit characteristics of a greenium, whereas, in emerging markets, the environmental aspect is still developing. This observation supports the notion that greenium is more pronounced in mature markets with heightened environmental sensitivity. Differently from previous studies, we filter the model for bonds issued during the Covid19 pandemic and not, and the results suggests the presence of a greenium only in normal times (Zerbib, 2019a, 2019b). The analysis contributes to the research on the green bond market and its dynamics. We prove that greenium is not universally present or significant, especially in emerging markets. These insights are relevant for investors and policymakers considering the implications of green finance for sustainable development and climate change mitigation.
Suggested Citation
Valentina Cioli & Roberto Bianchini & Alessandro Giannozzi & Oliviero Roggi, 2024.
"Does Greenium Exist? A Comparison between Sovereign and Corporate Bonds,"
International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(6), pages 251-251, December.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:19:y:2024:i:6:p:251
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:19:y:2024:i:6:p:251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.