IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v19y2024i2p171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-Shock Budgeting: A Methodological Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Candio

Abstract

Traditional budgeting approaches have been criticised and called into question as not being able to adapt to management dynamics and context-specific planning needs. This is especially the case when major crises occur, with increased forecast uncertainty as a result. Adaptive techniques such as rolling and continuous budgeting have been developed to address such concerns, though trade-offs between the resulting optimisation of the planning, control and performance evaluation functions exist. A key, though not exclusive, effect of crises is the likely nonlinearity of effects of unit prices which will tend to revert to the mean, or in other words, rebound and gradually converge to pre-shock levels or to a steady state. Aiming to fill this research gap, this study presents a methodological framework, framed within a survival analysis paradigm, which can be used for post-shock budgeting. Following a description of the mathematical properties and steps required for application, the framework is illustrated using a stylised example of operational budget with results being compared between linear and nonlinear price rebound trajectories. The presented framework is a relatively simple and flexible solution to the issue of post-shock budgeting which can be readily developed and adapted, therefore lending itself to a widespread use.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Candio, 2024. "Post-Shock Budgeting: A Methodological Framework," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(2), pages 171-171, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:19:y:2024:i:2:p:171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/49959/54035
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/49959
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Hansen, 2011. "A Theoretical Analysis of the Impact of Adopting Rolling Budgets, Activity-Based Budgeting and Beyond Budgeting," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 289-319.
    2. Niels Sandalgaard & Christian Nielsen, 2018. "Budget emphasis in small and medium-sized enterprises: evidence from Denmark," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(3), pages 351-364, September.
    3. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-08-2016-0087 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. David M. J. Naimark & Nader N. Kabboul & Murray D. Krahn, 2014. "Response to “The Life Table Method of Half-Cycle Correction: Getting It Rightâ€," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 34(3), pages 286-287, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiina Henttu-Aho, 2018. "The role of rolling forecasting in budgetary control systems: reactive and proactive types of planning," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 327-360, December.
    2. Bhimani, Alnoor & Sivabalan, Prabhu & Soonawalla, Kazbi, 2018. "A study of the linkages between rolling budget forms, uncertainty and strategy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 306-323.
    3. Arnold, Markus & Artz, Martin, 2019. "The use of a single budget or separate budgets for planning and performance evaluation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 50-67.
    4. Jean‐François Henri & Steeve Massicotte & Dominique Arbour, 2020. "Exploring the Consequences of Competing Uses of Budgets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 30(4), pages 257-268, December.
    5. Staci A. Kenno & Michelle C. Lau & Barbara J. Sainty, 2018. "In Search of a Theory of Budgeting: A Literature Review," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 507-553, December.
    6. Helmut Wasserbacher & Martin Spindler, 2022. "Machine learning for financial forecasting, planning and analysis: recent developments and pitfalls," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 63-88, March.
    7. Maritana Sedysheva, 2011. "Building High Performance Strategy of Military Expenditures: The Utility Function in the Middle of Defence Budgeting," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 11(4), pages 271-286.
    8. Helmut Wasserbacher & Martin Spindler, 2021. "Machine Learning for Financial Forecasting, Planning and Analysis: Recent Developments and Pitfalls," Papers 2107.04851, arXiv.org.
    9. Mareike Bergmann & Christian Brück & Thorsten Knauer & Anja Schwering, 2020. "Digitization of the budgeting process: determinants of the use of business analytics and its effect on satisfaction with the budgeting process," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 25-54, April.
    10. Pierluigi Santosuosso, 2016. "A Ten-Step Model for Solving Ethical Dilemmas," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(12), pages 1-30, November.
    11. Cardos Ildiko Reka & Pete Stefan & Cardos Vasile Daniel, 2014. "Traditional Budgeting Versus Beyond Budgeting: A Literature Review," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 573-581, July.
    12. Tiina Henttu-Aho & Janne J�rvinen, 2013. "A Field Study of the Emerging Practice of Beyond Budgeting in Industrial Companies: An Institutional Perspective," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 765-785, December.
    13. Pedroso, Elsa & Gomes, Carlos F., 2024. "Disentangling the effects of top management on management accounting systems utilization," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    14. Andrea Cardoni & Martin Hiebl & Alessio Paradisi, 2023. "Management accounting implementation in SMEs: A Structured Literature Review," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(2 Suppl.), pages 189-214.
    15. Andrea Cardoni & Alessio Paradisi, 2020. "The implementation of management accounting in small-medium enterprises (SMEs). A knowledge transfer perspective," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(Suppl. 1), pages 39-61.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:19:y:2024:i:2:p:171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.