IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v14y2021i11p139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Every Cloud Has a Silver Lining: A History of Barriers to Intellectual Capital Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Montemari
  • Maria Serena Chiucchi
  • Marco Gatti

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the Intellectual Capital Accounting (ICA) literature by investigating the barriers to IC measurement and how they can (re)shape IC measurement projects. The paper presents an interventionist case study of a company which has been measuring its IC for several years. It focuses on some emblematic situations in which barriers arose during the design and implementation of IC indicators followed by a (re)moulding of the IC measurement project within the organization. The case analysis revealed two barriers- the heavy workload that the design and calculation process of IC indicators entails and the perceived limited reliability of those indicators. These barriers did not lead to a complete failure of the project, but acted as a “filter”, resulting in the discontinued use of those indicators that were not perceived as useful or reliable and in the adoption of those that the managers actually considered useful. While this hindered a complete implementation of the ICMS, it promoted a selection of IC indicators and a legitimation of those that subsequently became part of the management control system. While previous studies explore how barriers can hamper the design as well as the implementation of an ICMS, this paper sheds light on what happens to IC measurement projects when the magnitude of barriers is not so significant as to lead to the complete failure of the project. This offers a new and different view of the barriers related to the adoption of ICMSs. Rather than considering them as factors which can interrupt IC measurement, they could be seen as factors which can challenge the implementation of the ICMS, strengthening those IC indicators that are perceived as reliable and useful and eliminating or disregarding those that did not meet expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Montemari & Maria Serena Chiucchi & Marco Gatti, 2021. "Every Cloud Has a Silver Lining: A History of Barriers to Intellectual Capital Measurement," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(11), pages 139-139, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/41010/42368
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/41010
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandy Q. Qu & John Dumay, 2011. "The qualitative research interview," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(3), pages 238-264, August.
    2. Juhani Vaivio, 2004. "Mobilizing local knowledge with 'Provocative' non-financial measures," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 39-71.
    3. Christian Nielsen & Robin Roslender & Stefan Schaper, 2017. "Explaining the demise of the intellectual capital statement in Denmark," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(1), pages 38-64, January.
    4. Guthrie, James & Ricceri, Federica & Dumay, John, 2012. "Reflections and projections: A decade of Intellectual Capital Accounting Research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 68-82.
    5. Jönsson, Sten & Lukka, Kari, 2005. "Doing interventionist research in management accounting," GRI-rapport 2005:6, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg Research Institute GRI.
    6. Suresh Cuganesan & Christina Boedker & James Guthrie, 2007. "Enrolling discourse consumers to affect material intellectual capital practice," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(6), pages 883-911, October.
    7. Marco Gatti & Maria Serena Chiucchi, 2017. "Context matters - Il ruolo del contesto negli studi di controllo di gestione," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(3), pages 5-10.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Giuliani & Maria Serena Chiucchi, 2019. "Guess who’s coming to dinner: the case of IC reporting in Italy," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 403-433, June.
    2. Stefania Veltri & Giovanni Bronzetti, 2015. "A Critical Analysis of the Intellectual Capital Measuring, Managing, and Reporting Practices in the Non-profit Sector: Lessons Learnt from a Case Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 305-318, October.
    3. Marco Giuliani, 2021. "Thinking Critically about Intellectual Liabilities: A Practice-Based Perspective," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(3), pages 111-111, July.
    4. Stefania Veltri & Pina Puntillo, 2020. "On intellectual capital management as an evaluation criterion for university managers: a case study," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(1), pages 135-167, March.
    5. Francesco Badia & Grazia Dicuonzo & Saverio Petruzzelli & Vittorio Dell’Atti, 2019. "Integrated reporting in action: mobilizing intellectual capital to improve management and governance practices," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 299-320, June.
    6. Ilenia Ascani & Marco Gatti & Maria Serena Chiucchi, 2021. "Pandemia e sistema di budgeting: quali effetti sulla figura del controller?," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(3), pages 65-86.
    7. Giuliani, Marco & Skoog, Matti, 2020. "Making sense of the temporal dimension of intellectual capital: A critical case study," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    8. Maurizio Cisi & Francesca Alice Centrone, 2021. "The Human Capital for Value Creation and Social Impact: The Interpretation of the IR’s HC Definition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Sandra Brosnan & David O’Donnell & Philip O’Regan, 2019. "A performative exploration of the lifeworlds of human capital and financial capital: an intellectual capital case vignette," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 321-344, June.
    10. Ilenia Ascani & Roberta Ciccola & Maria Serena Chiucchi, 2021. "A Structured Literature Review about the Role of Management Accountants in Sustainability Accounting and Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    11. de Villiers, Charl & Sharma, Umesh, 2020. "A critical reflection on the future of financial, intellectual capital, sustainability and integrated reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Martin Piber & Paola Demartini & Lucia Biondi, 2019. "The management of participatory cultural initiatives: learning from the discourse on intellectual capital," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 435-458, June.
    13. Corinne Ollier Bessieux & Emmanuelle Negre & Marie-Anne Verdier, 2022. "Moving from Accounting for People to Accounting with People: A Critical Analysis of the Literature and Avenues for Research," Post-Print hal-03889478, HAL.
    14. Maria Serena Chiucchi & Marco Giuliani & Stefano Marasca, 2014. "The design, implementation and use of intellectual capital measurements: a case study," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2), pages 143-168.
    15. Secundo, Giustina & Elena Perez, Susana & Martinaitis, Žilvinas & Leitner, Karl Heinz, 2017. "An Intellectual Capital framework to measure universities' third mission activities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 229-239.
    16. Rooney, Jim & Dumay, John, 2016. "Intellectual capital, calculability and qualculation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 1-16.
    17. Ionela Corina Chersan & Valentin Florentin Dumitru & Cãtãlina Gorgan & Vasile Gorgan, 2020. "Green Public Procurement in the Academic Literature," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(53), pages 1-82, February.
    18. Ratapol Wudhikarn & Nopasit Chakpitak & Gilles Neubert, 2020. "Improving the Strategic Benchmarking of Intellectual Capital Management in Logistics Service Providers," Post-Print hal-03188190, HAL.
    19. Barajas, Angel & Shakina, Elena & Fernández-Jardón, Carlos, 2017. "Acceleration effect of intangibles in the recovery of corporate performance after-crisis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1115-1122.
    20. Pina Puntillo & Carmela Gulluscio & Donald Huisingh & Stefania Veltri, 2021. "Reevaluating waste as a resource under a circular economy approach from a system perspective: Findings from a case study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 968-984, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.