IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v11y2016i3p173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Underlying Dimensions of the Hindrances to the Application of Forensic Accounting Techniques in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Eme Efiong
  • Ethel Inyang
  • Charles Effiong

Abstract

The study identified the underlying factors that hinder the application of forensic accounting techniques in Nigeria. Data for the study were obtained from questionnaire administered on chief financial officers in Ministries, Departments and Agencies in 9 sampled States and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. The application of factor analysis statistical techniques collapsed the 23 measured variables into three factors. The factors were named ‘legal factor’, ‘educational factor’ and ‘political factor’ in that order of importance. It was concluded that these three factors constitute the major hindrances to the application of forensic accounting techniques for fraud prevention and detection in Nigeria. It is recommended that the legal system should be strengthened to be able to effectively handle fraud cases; educational and training institutions should embark on the training of forensic accountant; and the government should have the political will to prosecute offenders and institutionalize policies beyond what are on ground for the effective application of forensic accounting techniques in the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Eme Efiong & Ethel Inyang & Charles Effiong, 2016. "Underlying Dimensions of the Hindrances to the Application of Forensic Accounting Techniques in Nigeria," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 173-173, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:11:y:2016:i:3:p:173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/56206/30883
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/56206
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hakeem Ishola Mobolaji & Kamil Omoteso, 2009. "Corruption and economic growth in some selected transitional economies," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(1), pages 70-82, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huseyin Aytug & Siong Hook Law & Nirvikar Singh, 2018. "What Can We Learn from Global and Regional Rankings of Countries?," Millennial Asia, , vol. 9(2), pages 119-139, August.
    2. Huang, Chiung-Ju, 2016. "Is corruption bad for economic growth? Evidence from Asia-Pacific countries," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 247-256.
    3. Joshua Sunday Riti & Happy Daniel Gubak, 2021. "Nexus of Corruption Control and Economic Development in African Least Corrupt Countries," Journal of Contemporary Research in Social Sciences, Michael Laurence, vol. 3(1), pages 1-10.
    4. Hailin Chen & Friedrich Schneider & Qunli Sun, 2018. "Size, Determinants, and Consequences of Corruption in China's Provinces: The MIMIC Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 7175, CESifo.
    5. Mounir Belloumi & Atef Saad Alshehry, 2021. "The Causal Relationships Between Corruption, Investments and Economic Growth in GCC Countries," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    6. Helmi Hamdi & Abdelaziz Hakimi, 2023. "Corruption, imported innovation, and growth: Evidence using the panel smooth transition regression approach for developing countries," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 956-972, June.
    7. Hbib Sekrafi & Asma Sghaier, 2018. "Examining the Relationship Between Corruption, Economic Growth, Environmental Degradation, and Energy Consumption: a Panel Analysis in MENA Region," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(3), pages 963-979, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:11:y:2016:i:3:p:173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.