IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v12y2019i4p90-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contemporary Issues Surrounding an Impairment-Only Approach to Acquired Goodwill: A Selected Review

Author

Listed:
  • Jamaliah Abdul Majid

Abstract

This paper presents a selected review of contemporary issues surrounding an impairment-only approach to accounting for acquired goodwill and addresses the question of whether an impairment-only approach has resulted in an improvement in an accounting for goodwill. The review is structured around three main themes: concerned raised by stakeholders regarding an impairment-only approach, causes of the debates on goodwill impairment, and proposed solutions offered by stakeholders. The contribution of this paper to the debate on an impairment-only approach to acquired goodwill is to demonstrate that even though an impairment-only approach has posed implementation, auditing and enforcement challenges, it has also encouraged standard-setters, regulators and firms worldwide to make concerted efforts in bringing in more clarity to the valuation of goodwill and its impairment test. The review ends by offering practical ways forward on an accounting for acquired goodwill.

Suggested Citation

  • Jamaliah Abdul Majid, 2019. "Contemporary Issues Surrounding an Impairment-Only Approach to Acquired Goodwill: A Selected Review," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 90-97, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:4:p:90-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/download/0/0/38887/39599
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/0/38887
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul André & Andrei Filip & Luc Paugam, 2016. "Examining the Patterns of Goodwill Impairments in Europe and the US," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 329-352, September.
    2. David Cairns, 2015. "Financial Reporting in Europe: Future Challenges," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 187-196, December.
    3. Mazni Abdullah & Lisa Evans & Ian Fraser & Ioannis Tsalavoutas, 2015. "IFRS Mandatory disclosures in Malaysia: the influence of family control and the value (ir)relevance of compliance levels," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 328-348, December.
    4. Tyrone M. Carlin & Nigel Finch & Nur Hidayah Laili, 2009. "Investigating audit quality among Big 4 Malaysian firms," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(2), pages 96-114, July.
    5. Diogenis Baboukardos & Gunnar Rimmel, 2014. "Goodwill under IFRS: Relevance and disclosures in an unfavorable environment," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Baboukardos, Diogenis & Rimmel, Gunnar, 2014. "Goodwill under IFRS: Relevance and disclosures in an unfavorable environment," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 1-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsalavoutas, Ioannis & Tsoligkas, Fanis & Evans, Lisa, 2020. "Compliance with IFRS mandatory disclosure requirements: A structured literature review," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    2. Julius Gaël Tchatchou Tchaptchet & Olivier Colot, 2019. "Goodwill’s Accounting Practices in Belgium and Compliance with IAS 36 Required Disclosures," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 139-152, March.
    3. d'Arcy, Anne & Tarca, Ann, 2018. "Reviewing IFRS Goodwill Accounting Research: Implementation Effects and Cross-Country Differences," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 203-226.
    4. Redhwan Ahmed Ali Al-Dhamari & Sitraselvi Chandren, 2018. "Audit Partners Gender, Auditor Quality and Clients Value Relevance," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(4), pages 952-967, August.
    5. Spasić Dejan, 2018. "Do Serbian Companies Provide Relevant Disclosures About Goodwill?," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 56(1), pages 127-138, April.
    6. Nicola Giuseppe Castellano & Katia Corsi & Roberto Del Gobbo, 2015. "Goodwill Disclosure in Europe. Profiles of disclosing companies," Eastern European Business and Economics Journal, Eastern European Business and Economics Studies Centre, vol. 1(2), pages 32-65.
    7. Gonçalves, Rute & Lopes, Patrícia & Craig, Russell, 2017. "Value relevance of biological assets under IFRS," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 118-126.
    8. Rute Gonçalves & Patrícia Lopes, 2015. "Value-Relevance of Biological Assets under IFRS," FEP Working Papers 556, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    9. repec:eeb:15v1n2:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:32-65 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Musa Yelwa Abubakar & Nasiru Abdulsallam & Muhammad Yusuf Alkali, 2017. "The Impact of the New Accounting Reporting Among Listed Firms in Nigerian Stock Market," Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9.
    11. Lorenzo Simoni & Stefan Schaper & Christian Nielsen, 2022. "Business Model Disclosures, Market Values, and Earnings Persistence: Evidence From the UK," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 58(1), pages 142-173, March.
    12. Durocher, Sylvain & Georgiou, Omiros, 2022. "Framing accounting for goodwill: Intractable controversies between users and standard setters," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. Yusuf, Fatima & Yousaf, Amna & Saeed, Abubakr, 2018. "Rethinking agency theory in developing countries: A case study of Pakistan," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 281-292.
    14. George Drogalas & Michail Nerantzidis & Dimitrios Mitskinis & Ioannis Tampakoudis, 2021. "The relationship between audit fees and audit committee characteristics: evidence from the Athens Stock Exchange," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(1), pages 24-41, March.
    15. Niclas Hellman & Jordi Carenys & Soledad Moya Gutierrez, 2018. "Introducing More IFRS Principles of Disclosure – Will the Poor Disclosers Improve?," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 242-321, May.
    16. Abdul Majid, Jamaliah, 2015. "Reporting incentives, ownership concentration by the largest outside shareholder, and reported goodwill impairment losses," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 199-214.
    17. Najihah Yaacob & Ayoib Che-Ahmad, 2012. "Audit Fees after IFRS Adoption: Evidence from Malaysia," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 2(1), pages 31-46, June.
    18. Sandgren, Mattias & Uman, Timur & Nordqvist, Mattias, 2024. "The role of the strategic apex in shaping the disclosure strategy: A family firm in crisis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(3).
    19. Atanasov, Atanas, 2018. "Фактори, Влияещи Върху Обезценката На Репутацията [Goodwill Impairment Factors]," MPRA Paper 87625, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Wolfgang Ballwieser, 2020. "International Valuation Standards (IVS) – Bedarf, Reichweite, Würdigung, diskutiert anhand der Bewertung von Unternehmen und Goodwill [International Valuation Standards (IVS)—Demand, Range, Critica," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 71-94, March.
    21. Mazzi, Francesco & Slack, Richard & Tsalavoutas, Ioannis, 2018. "The effect of corruption and culture on mandatory disclosure compliance levels: Goodwill reporting in Europe," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 52-73.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    goodwill; goodwill impairment; delayed expected loss; impairment-only approach; IFRS 3; IAS 36;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • F31 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Exchange
    • F41 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Open Economy Macroeconomics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:4:p:90-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.