IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/hesjnl/v10y2020i2p95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Academics' Opinions on Organizational Democracy and the Perception of Academic Freedom and the Appropriate Level in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Suheyla Bozkurt
  • Ali Balci

Abstract

The study aimed to determine how lecturers have adopted organizational democracy and academic freedom in Turkish state universities, as well as to find out their views on its appropriation for Turkey. A correlative descriptive survey model is used in this study. The study sample was included 418 academics working at state universities in Ankara. For this research, an ‘Organizational Democracy Scale’ and an ‘Academic Freedom Scale’ were developed and employed by the researcher, and the obtained data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software. The arithmetic mean and the standard deviation were calculated for the answers provided by the academics. Regression analysis was conducted to find out the effect of organizational democracy on academic freedom. In the qualitative phase of the study, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 20 academics. NVivo 10 software was used to analyze the content of the interviews. At the end of the study, it was found that university administrations should avoid discriminative attitudes; should account for their decisions and implementations; deans and faculty boards should be elected democratically; all stakeholders (apart from academics), including students, should take part in both elections and be involved in management processes; and finally, the election system should be more democratic.

Suggested Citation

  • Suheyla Bozkurt & Ali Balci, 2020. "Academics' Opinions on Organizational Democracy and the Perception of Academic Freedom and the Appropriate Level in Turkey," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 1-95, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/download/0/0/42310/44089
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/view/0/42310
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.