Author
Abstract
BACKGROUND & PURPOSE- One important effort in reducing the Maternal Mortality Rate is integration of Family Planning services into Health Insurance policy. This is giving affordability in health service financing through providing contraceptive accordance with established policy. The purpose of this study is to examine women’s participation in health insurance and correlations to contraception use.MATERIAL & METHODS- The study used the 2012 Indonesian Demographic and Health Survey data-set. Samples were women aged 15 to 49 years, of married status or living together (n=33,465). The dependent variable was contraception used for three categories- Using Long Term Contraceptive, using non-Long Term Contraceptive, and not using any kind of contraception. Data analysis used Chi-square and multinomial logistic regression with complex sample.RESULTS- 10.6% of women were found to have used a Long Term Contraception method. Health insurance membership has correlations to contraceptive use (OR=1.241 and 0.964, p<0.05, CI 95%), with confounder variables of age (p<0.05, OR=1.428 and 0.648), education (p<0.05, OR=1.402 and 1.064), work status (p<0.05, OR=1.151 and 0.966), parity (p<0.05, OR=3.114 and 1.685), perception of ideal number of children (p<0.05, OR=2.057 and 1.682), husband’s education (p<0.05, OR=0.166 and 0.920), husband's work (p<0.05, OR=1.247 and 2.469), and role of media (p<0.05, OR=1.255 and 1.084).CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS- This study was empirical evidence in Indonesia that health insurance factors have a significant correlation to Long Term Contraceptive use in women. It is recommended for government to maintain and improve policies that integrate Family Planning services into National Health Insurance.
Suggested Citation
Misnaniarti Misnaniarti, 2017.
"Women’s Membership in Health Insurance and Correlation with Contraception Use in Indonesia,"
Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(2), pages 1-85, February.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:85
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.