Author
Abstract
BACKGROUND- The epidemiologic magnitude of the NPS (ab)use has been thoroughly explored and geographically mapped in the developed world. However, there are still untapped geographic locations primarily in the developing countries including the Middle East. Historically, mapping has been done via observational analytics, cross-sectionally and longitudinally, in addition to few experimental studies.MATERIALS & METHODS- The study is cross-sectional; it will implement the internet snapshot technique, in addition to the application of thematic analysis and psychoanalysis of comments of NPS (ab)users on the online drug fora and social communication media. The data collected will be analysed for the purpose of concluding a statistical inference in relation to the terms most preferred by substance (ab)users towards hallucinogenic substances.RESULTS- The population was dominated by right-handed males; most of which were either heterosexual or bisexual. Psychedelics users have a preference for specific terms; psychedelic (73%), entheogen (12%), hallucinogen (11%), spiritual aids (3%), mysticomimetic (1%), psychotomimetic (<1%), medicines (<1%), and trip (<1%). Right-handed users who used the term psychedelic were a majority (53%), while right-handed individuals using the terms entheogen and hallucinogen contributed to 8% for each.CONCLUSION- This study is in line with other studies confirming the minute contribution of the Middle East to the global NPS phenomenon. Additional studies are mandatory for different populations including; students, academics and researchers, medical professionals, psychiatric patients, military and para-military organisations, delinquent and prisoners, and even terrorists.
Suggested Citation
Ahmed Al-Imam, 2017.
"The Preferred Terminology Implemented by Psychedelic Users Existing on Online Platforms: A Cross-sectional Analysis,"
Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(11), pages 140-140, November.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:140
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.