IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v16y2024i7p64-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison between Digital Blood Pressure Monitors for Home Use (Wrist) and (Arm) with a Mercury Sphygmomanometer

Author

Listed:
  • Rasil Alotaibi
  • Basmah Alrashdi
  • Nehad Alhashmi
  • B. O. El-bashir
  • Hussein Eledum

Abstract

Blood pressure disease (BP) is one of the major public health problems around the world. There are many digital BP devices used at home. Doubts are usually raised about these devices. This study aimed to compare home (wrist) and (arm) digital blood pressure monitors with a mercury sphygmomanometer. This study was conducted at the University of Tabuk, comparing a digital BP meter (arm) and (wrist) with a properly calibrated mercury BP. A total of 100 randomly selected students aged 18 to 39 years were enrolled. Two blood pressure measurements for each person were recorded by all devices, and the values were recorded taking into account the environment of a person. The data were entered into MS Excel and analysis was done by using Social Sciences version 23.0. The normality of data was performed by the Shapiro-Wilk test and it was normally distributed. The mean and standard deviation were calculated for quantitative variables, while frequencies and percentages were provided for qualitative variables. Paired sample t-test was used to compare the mean values of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Digital arm devices had sensitivity and specificity of 62.5% and 63%, respectively, compared to digital wrist devices, which had sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 56%, respectively. The readings of the digital blood pressure monitors were comparable to the readings of the mercury blood pressure monitor. Both devices could be considered indispensable tools for detecting hypertension at home and thus useful for early diagnosis.

Suggested Citation

  • Rasil Alotaibi & Basmah Alrashdi & Nehad Alhashmi & B. O. El-bashir & Hussein Eledum, 2024. "Comparison between Digital Blood Pressure Monitors for Home Use (Wrist) and (Arm) with a Mercury Sphygmomanometer," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(7), pages 64-70, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:64-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/50508/54711
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/50508
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:64-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.