IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v15y2023i3p20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Comparison of Aggressive Driving Behavior between Pakistan and China Based on Driver Behavior Questionnaire

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Murtaza
  • Jinxi Zhang
  • Mehtab Ur Rehman
  • Kamran Iqbal

Abstract

Aggressive Driving behavior plays a key role in road safety as it is important in road traffic accident prevention. The aim of this study was to investigate the aggressive driving behavior attitude towards road safety issues in Pakistan and china and the applicability of three-factor structure (aggressive violations, ordinary violations and errors) of both version of driver behavior questionnaire (DBQ). T-test was conducted to evaluate significant differences and it exposed that Chinese sample is more significant. Confirmatory factor analysis was tested and calculated on both samples. Chinese samples fit the CFA statistics models best as compared to Pakistani sample. Additionally, Pakistan drivers especially the younger drivers were mostly engaged in aggression and errors, while Chinese drivers appeared more disciplined and rule followers.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Murtaza & Jinxi Zhang & Mehtab Ur Rehman & Kamran Iqbal, 2023. "The Comparison of Aggressive Driving Behavior between Pakistan and China Based on Driver Behavior Questionnaire," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/48384/52060
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/48384
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.