IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v13y2021i1p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medication Reconciliation during Admission at University Hospital

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiane Contin
  • Liliane Bernardes Campos
  • Mônica Cristina Toffoli-Kadri
  • Vanessa T. Gubert de Matos

Abstract

INTRODUCTION- Medication reconciliation is the process of comparing the most accurate list of all medications that a patient is taking with the list of prescription drugs within the healthcare system while considering the patient’s allergies and history of side effects. OBJECTIVES- To reconcile medication upon the patients’ admission to a university hospital in the municipality of Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. METHOD- A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted between June 2018 and May 2019 at the medical clinic unit of an university hospital. Discrepancies observed between the prescription and the best possible medication history were classified as intentional discrepancy; undocumented intentional; and unintentional. RESULTS- A total of 1,134 discrepancies were found between home-based drugs and those prescribed upon admission to the MCU. Among the discrepancies, 815 (72%) were intentional, 89 (8%) were undocumented intentional, and 230 (20%) were unintentional. The number of consultation sources and the number of medicines in use at home showed significant correlation with the occurrence of unintentional discrepancies (p = 0.039 and p = 0.008, respectively). A total of 318 pharmaceutical interventions were performed, 230 related to unintended discrepancies. Of these, 138 (60%) interventions were not accepted. CONCLUSION- The study verified the high frequency of drug omission, conferring treatment interruption and the need for pharmaceutical assistance of polymedicated patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiane Contin & Liliane Bernardes Campos & Mônica Cristina Toffoli-Kadri & Vanessa T. Gubert de Matos, 2021. "Medication Reconciliation during Admission at University Hospital," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 1-1, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/44188/46547
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/44188
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Health Organization, 2019. "WHO global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco use 2000-2025, third edition," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt0z43b5dv, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    2. World Health Organization, 2018. "WHO global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco smoking 2000–2025, second edition," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt4dc4t5d9, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. P. V. Asharani & Jue Hua Lau & Vanessa Ai Ling Seet & Fiona Devi & Peizhi Wang & Kumarasan Roystonn & Ying Ying Lee & Laxman Cetty & Wen Lin Teh & Swapna Verma & Yee Ming Mok & Siow Ann Chong & Mythil, 2021. "Smoking-Related Health Beliefs in a Sample of Psychiatric Patients: Factors Associated with the Health Beliefs and Validation of the Health Belief Questionnaire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Fiona Dobbie & Martine Miller & Man Hei Marcus Kam & Aoife McKenna & Claire Glen & Alison McCallum, 2022. "DASHES Protocol: Development and Feasibility Testing of a Tailored Community Programme to Support People in Recovery from Problematic Alcohol and Drug Use to Cut Down or Stop Smoking Using Co-Creation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-9, October.
    3. Kerem Shuval & Michal Stoklosa & Nigar Nargis & Jeffrey Drope & Shay Tzafrir & Lital Keinan-Boker & Laura F. DeFina & Mahmoud Qadan, 2021. "Cigarette Prices and Smoking Behavior in Israel: Findings from a National Study of Adults (2002–2017)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-11, August.
    4. J. E. Prieger & A. Choi, 2024. "E-cigarettes and Smoking: Correlation, Causation, and Selection Bias," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 471-498, December.
    5. Ilona Wężyk-Caba & Małgorzata Znyk & Radosław Zajdel & Łukasz Balwicki & Anna Tyrańska-Fobke & Grzegorz Juszczyk & Karolina Zajdel & Beata Świątkowska & Dorota Kaleta, 2022. "Determinants of E-Cigarette and Cigarette Use among Youth and Young Adults in Poland—PolNicoYouth Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Yichen Shen & Haruko Noguchi, 2021. "The effect of coverage of smoking‐cessation aids on tobacco use: Evidence from Canada," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(9), pages 2200-2216, September.
    7. Martin, Leanne & White, Mathew P. & Pahl, Sabine & May, Jon & Wheeler, Benedict W., 2020. "Neighbourhood greenspace and smoking prevalence: Results from a nationally representative survey in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.