IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v10y2018i2p11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences of Post-Placement Bone Implant Contact (BIC) Value of Dental Implant Coated and Not Coated With Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)

Author

Listed:
  • Bahruddin Thalib
  • Edy Machmud
  • M. Dharmautama
  • Ervina Surya
  • Asmawati Asmawati
  • Rafikah Hasyim

Abstract

OBJECTIVE- The success of a dental dental implant treatment focuses on a phenomenon called osseointegration. Evaluation of Bone Area (BA) and Bone-Dental implant Contact (BIC) through histomorphometric analysis is the most widely used parameter to measure osseointegration. The aim of this study was to see post-placement Bone Dental implant Contact (BIC) value of dental implant coated and not coated with PRP.MATERIALS & METHODS- This study was an experimental laboratory conducted at Laboratory of Veterinary Faculty, Hasanuddin University. The sample was baby buck rabbit, aged 4-8 months old, weight 1500–2000 gram, divided into 2 groups each group consist of 12 rabbit, control group not coated with PRP and treatment group coated with PRP. Data analysis using SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).RESULTS- There was a significant difference between the mean BIC values and the 20% increase in BIC values in LP1, LP2 and LP3 between treatment and control group on day 0, 3, 7, and 14.CONCLUSIONS- There was a difference in the average of post-placement BIC value of dental implant coated and not coated with PRP.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahruddin Thalib & Edy Machmud & M. Dharmautama & Ervina Surya & Asmawati Asmawati & Rafikah Hasyim, 2018. "Differences of Post-Placement Bone Implant Contact (BIC) Value of Dental Implant Coated and Not Coated With Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/72503/39664
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/72503
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.